Isaharov v. Berryhill
Filing
34
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Cobb's report and recommendation (ECF No. 32 ) is accepted; plaintiff Tanya Isaharov's motion to remand (ECF No. 15 ) is DENIED; defendant Nancy Berryhill's motion to affirm (ECF No. 21 ) is GRANTED; Clerk directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant Nancy Berryhill and against plaintiff Tanya Isaharov. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 TANYA LULU ISAHAROV,
4
Plaintiff
5 v.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01958-APG-WGC
Order (1) Accepting Report and
Recommendation, (2) Denying Motion to
Remand, and (3) Granting Motion to
Affirm
6 NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
[ECF Nos. 15, 21, 32]
7
8
Defendant
On January 22, 2020, Magistrate Judge Cobb recommended that I deny plaintiff Tanya
9 Isaharov’s motion to remand and grant the defendant’s motion to affirm. ECF No. 32. Isaharov
10 did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and
11 recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo
12 determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is
13 made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the
14 district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if
15 objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).
16
I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Cobb’s report and recommendation (ECF
17 No. 32) is accepted, plaintiff Tanya Isaharov’s motion to remand (ECF No. 15) is DENIED,
18 and defendant Nancy Berryhill’s motion to affirm (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED. The clerk of
19 court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of defendant Nancy Berryhill and against plaintiff
20 Tanya Isaharov.
21
DATED this 10th day of February, 2020.
22
23
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?