Isaharov v. Berryhill

Filing 34

ORDER that Magistrate Judge Cobb's report and recommendation (ECF No. 32 ) is accepted; plaintiff Tanya Isaharov's motion to remand (ECF No. 15 ) is DENIED; defendant Nancy Berryhill's motion to affirm (ECF No. 21 ) is GRANTED; Clerk directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant Nancy Berryhill and against plaintiff Tanya Isaharov. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 TANYA LULU ISAHAROV, 4 Plaintiff 5 v. Case No.: 2:17-cv-01958-APG-WGC Order (1) Accepting Report and Recommendation, (2) Denying Motion to Remand, and (3) Granting Motion to Affirm 6 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, [ECF Nos. 15, 21, 32] 7 8 Defendant On January 22, 2020, Magistrate Judge Cobb recommended that I deny plaintiff Tanya 9 Isaharov’s motion to remand and grant the defendant’s motion to affirm. ECF No. 32. Isaharov 10 did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 11 recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo 12 determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 13 made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 14 district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 15 objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Cobb’s report and recommendation (ECF 17 No. 32) is accepted, plaintiff Tanya Isaharov’s motion to remand (ECF No. 15) is DENIED, 18 and defendant Nancy Berryhill’s motion to affirm (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED. The clerk of 19 court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of defendant Nancy Berryhill and against plaintiff 20 Tanya Isaharov. 21 DATED this 10th day of February, 2020. 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?