Beltran v. American National Property and Casualty Company
Filing
18
ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-01961-APG-PAL Document 17 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 3
1
JOHN T.KEATING
Nevada Bar No. 6373
2
BRYCE B. BUCKWALTER
3
Nevada Bar No. 7626
4
KEATING law group
9130 W. Russell Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
5
6
7
8
bbuckwalter@keatinglg. com
(702) 228-6800 phone
(702) 228-0443 facsimile
Attorneys for Defendant
American National Property and Casualty
Company
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
D
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
O
12
LYo
CDS
00
13
ANA I. BELTRAN,
CASE NO.:
2:17-cv-01961-APG-PAL
CO
14
O ulZ.
(/) >
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS
15
O
- a>
>
16
)
H> <
o-J
|S
> w°°
_ltfg
14
ulz
15
C/) to
The parties have stipulated and agreed tothe dismissal of the Defendant, HAMERICAN
ZU) <
_ a w
16
> <
o
o-"
ho
ORDER
17
NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY as set forth in the Stipulation, and good cause
5
LU
18
19
appearing.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff, ANA I. BELTRAN'S
20
Complaint as to Defendant, AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY be
21
22
23
dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own respective attorney's fees and costs herein.
Dated: February 20, 2018.
DATED this _ _ day of February, 2018.
24
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
PEGGY A. LEEN
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:17-cv-01961-APG-PAL Document 17 Filed 02/20/18 Page 3 of 3
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01961-APG-PAL
2
3
4
5
Submitted By:
KEATING law group
6
/s/ Brvce B. Buckwalter
BRYCE B. BUCKWALTER
Nevada Bar No. 7626
9130 West Russell Road, Suite 200
10
11
D
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Attorney for Defendant
American National Propertyand Casualty
Company
o
12
£55
13
00
>
o
M
16
V)
17
5
LU
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?