U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 35

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 14 defendant SFR's motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 19 defendant Tapestry's motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 8 9 10 Case No. 2:17-CV-1962 JCM (VCF) Plaintiff(s), ORDER v. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 14 15 16 Presently before the court is defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s (“SFR”) motion to dismiss plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association’s complaint. (ECF No. 14). Also before the court is defendant Tapestry at Town Center Homeowners Association’s (“Tapestry”) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 19). 17 On January 23, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion to amend its complaint. (ECF No. 28). On 18 February 13, 2018, Magistrate Judge Ferenbach granted the motion. (ECF No. 31). On February 19 22, 2018, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 33). Defendants’ motions to dismiss 20 plaintiff’s original complaint are therefore moot. 21 Accordingly, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant SFR’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14) be, and 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Tapestry’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 19) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. DATED February 26, 2018. __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?