Tripp v. Clark County et al

Filing 216

ORDER granting 215 Stipulation Re: 197 , 198 , 199 , 200 , 201 Motions for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 12/13/2021. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/12/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-01964-JCM-BNW Document 215 Filed 10/08/21 Page 1 of 4 TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ 1 Nevada Bar No. 7373 2 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 703 S. Eighth Street 3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 388-4469 4 Facsimile: (702) 386-9825 5 Email: thatfield@hatfieldlawassociates.com Attorney for Plaintiff In conjunction with Legal Aid 6 Center of Southern Nevada Pro Bono Project 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 703 S.8th Street * Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 388-4469 10 JUSTIN L. TRIPP, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. CLARK COUNTY, et al 14 Defendants. 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Third Request) COMES NOW, Plaintiff Justin Tripp (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel, the law 16 17 CASE NO: 2:17-cv-01964-JCM-BNW firm of Hatfield & Associates., Ltd., appearing pro bono publico, and Defendant Cesar Esparza, 18 Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Defendants Michael Rose and Jacqulyn 19 Schumaker and Defendants LVMPD Sergeants’ (hereinafter “LVMPD Defendants”) by and 20 21 22 23 through their counsel, the law firm of Kaempfer Crowell, and Defendant NaphCare, Inc., Defendant Harry Duran, M.D., Defendant Eric Lopez, P.A., Defendant Rachel Scheiblich, Defendant Kendra Meyer, and Defendant Raymond Mondora, (hereinafter “NaphCare 24 Defendants”), by and through their counsel, the law firm of Lauria Tokunaga Gates & Linn, 25 LLP, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to Respond to the following 26 27 28 Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment, due on October 14, 2021, to December 13, 2021: /// /// Case 2:17-cv-01964-JCM-BNW Document 215 Filed 10/08/21 Page 2 of 4 1. 1 2. Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department’s Motion for Summary Judgment 2 3 [ECF #199]; 4 3. Defendants Michael Rose’s and Jacqulyn Schumaker’s Motion for Summary Judgment 5 [ECF #200]; 6 4. Defendants’ LVMPD Sergeants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF #201]. 7 5. NaphCare Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF #197]. 8 9 703 8th Street * Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 388-4469 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Defendant Cesar Esparza’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF #198]; This request is submitted pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2 and 7-1 and is the parties’ third 10 request for an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants’ Motions for Summary 11 Judgment. 12 Good cause exists for this extension. Plaintiff's counsel is requesting a sixty (60) day 13 14 extension of time up to and including December 13, 2021, to respond to all parties' Motions for 15 Summary Judgment as Plaintiff is in prison, communication must be scheduled, and the volume 16 of the motions. Plaintiff informed his counsel in July 2021 that he was being transferred to 17 another Federal Prison but did not know when he would arrive and where he would be residing 18 at that time. Plaintiff has been transported to several Federal Prison’s since July 2021, each time 19 20 having to deal with a twenty-one (21) day quarantine, but as of today, we have not been able to 21 ascertain if he has arrived at his final destination. 22 23 24 25 In addition, Plaintiff was not permitted to take his legal documents with him in transit. Therefore, Plaintiff’s counsel shall have to forward all of the legal documents to his new prison location once known. Defendants have courteously granted this extension of time for Plaintiff to 26 file his Responses. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 13, 2021, to 27 /// 28 /// -2- Case 2:17-cv-01964-JCM-BNW Document 215 Filed 10/08/21 Page 3 of 4 1 respond to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF #198], [ECF #199], [ECF #200], 2 [ECF #201] and [ECF #197]. 703 8th Street * Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 388-4469 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 3 4 DATED this 8th day of October, 2021 5 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES 6 /s/ Trevor J. Hatfield 7 By: TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ. (SBN 7373) 8 703 S. Eighth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 9 Tel: (702) 388-4469 Email: thatfield@hatfieldlawassociates.com 10 Attorney for Plaintiff In Conjunction with Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada Pro 11 Bono Project. 12 13 14 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 /// 28 /// -3- DATED this 8th day of October, 2021 KAEMPFER CROWELL /s/ Lyssa S. Anderson By: LYSSA S. ANDERSON, ESQ. (SBN 5781) RYAN W. DANIELS, ESQ. (SBN 13094) 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Ste. 650 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Tel: (702) 792-7000 Email: landerson@kcnvlaw.com Email: rdaniels@kcnvlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants Cesar Esparza, Michael Rose, Jacqulyn Schumaker, LVMPD Sergeants’. 703 8th Street * Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 388-4469 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Case 2:17-cv-01964-JCM-BNW Document 215 Filed 10/08/21 Page 4 of 4 1 DATED this 8th day of October, 2021. 2 LAURIA TOKUNAGA GATES & LINN, LLP 3 /s/ Paul A. Cardinale 4 By: _________________ PAUL A. CARDINALE, ESQ. (SBN 8394) 5 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 240 6 Sacramento, CA 95833 Tel.: (916) 492-2000 7 Email: pcardinale@ltglaw.net 8 Southern Nevada Office: 9 601 South Seventh Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 10 Tel.: (702) 387-8633 11 Attorneys for NAPHCARE, INC., an Alabama Corporation; HARRY DURAN, M.D., in his 12 individual capacity; ERIC LOPEZ, P.A., in his individual capacity; RACHEL SCHEIBLICH (formerly known as “RUDD”) in her individual capacity; KENDRA MEYER (formerly known as 13 SCHULTZ”) in her individual capacity, and RAYMOND MONDORA 14 15 16 17 ORDER 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Dated: 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- October 12, 2021

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?