Tripp v. Clark County et al

Filing 246

ORDER Granting 245 Stipulation for extension of time to respond to 244 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 10/28/2022. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE)

TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ
1 Nevada Bar No. 7373
2 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
703 S. Eighth Street
3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff In conjunction with Legal Aid
6 Center of Southern Nevada Pro Bono Project
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9

HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

703 S.8th Street * Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone [phone]

10

JUSTIN L. TRIPP,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,
vs.
CLARK COUNTY, et al

14

Defendants.

CASE NO: 2:17-cv-01964-JCM-BNW
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO NAPHCARE
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #244)
(First Request)

15
COMES NOW, Plaintiff Justin Tripp (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel, the law
16
17

firm of Hatfield & Associates., Ltd., appearing pro bono publico, and Defendant NaphCare, Inc.,

18 Defendant Harry Duran, M.D., Defendant Eric Lopez, P.A., Defendant Rachel Scheiblich,
19 Defendant Kendra Meyer, and Defendant Raymond Mondora, (hereinafter “NaphCare
20

Defendants”), by and through their counsel, the law firm of Medical Defense Law Group, and

21
hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to Respond to the NaphCare
22
23

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF #244], due on October 14, 2022 to October

24 28, 2022.
25
26

This request is submitted pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2 and 7-1 and is the parties’ first
request for an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants’ Motion for Summary

27
Judgment.
28

1

Good cause exists for this extension. Plaintiff's counsel is requesting a two (2) week

2 extension of time up to and including October 28, 2022. Plaintiff is incarcerated in F.C.I. Herlong,
3 in Herlong, California and Plaintiff’s Counsel has had difficulty communicating with him to
4 formulate an opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. In addition, settlement may
5

be explored whereby the motion may be moot if settlement is reached.

6
7

Defendants have courteously granted this extension of time for Plaintiff to file his

8 Response. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have up to and including October 28, 2022, to respond to
9 NaphCare Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF #244].

703 8th Street * Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone [phone]

HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

10 DATED this 12th day of October, 2022
11

DATED this ___th day of October, 2022

HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

MEDICAL DEFENSE LAW GROUP

12

By:
/s/ Trevor J. Hatfield
TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ. (SBN 7373)
703 S. Eighth Street
14
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Tel.: [phone]
15
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff In Conjunction with
16
Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada Pro
Bono Project.
17
13

18

By:___/s/ Paul A. Cardinale______________
PAUL A. CARDINALE, ESQ. (SBN 8394)
3800 Watt Avenue, Suite 245
Sacramento, CA 95821
Email: [e-mail]
Southern Nevada Office:
2965 South Jones Blvd., Suite E1
Las Vegas, NV 89146
Tel.: [phone]
Attorneys for NAPHCARE Defendants

19
20
21
22
23

ORDER

24 IT IS SO ORDERED:
25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26

Dated: October 14, 2022

27
28

-2-