Tripp v. Clark County et al

Filing 84

ORDER Re: Plaintiff's 83 Emergency Motion to Stay Case. Defendants have 14 days to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion and Plaintiff has seven (7) days to file a Reply, if any. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/30/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

JUSTIN L. TRIPP,

4
5
6

Case No. 2:17-cv-01964-JCM-BNW
Plaintiff

ORDER

v.
CLARK COUNTY et al.,

7

Defendants

8
9
10
11

Presently before the court is the matter of Tripp v. Clark County et al, case no.
2:17-cv-01964-JCM-BNW.

12

On July 29, 2019, pro se plaintiff Justin Tripp (“plaintiff”) filed an emergency motion

13

to stay case. (ECF No. 83). The court has reviewed the motion and finds that emergency

14

treatment of the motion is unwarranted. See LR 7-2 (“The court may determine whether

15

any matter submitted as an ‘emergency’ is, in fact, an emergency.”).

16

However, because the docketing system did not provide a response deadline, the

17

court hereby orders the following briefing schedule: defendants shall have fourteen (14)

18

days to file a response to plaintiff’s motion. Thereafter, plaintiff shall have seven (7) days

19

to file a reply, if any.

20

Accordingly,

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

DATED July 30, 2019.

23
24
25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE