Scolaro v. Vons Companies, Inc.

Filing 61

ORDER granting 60 Stipulation. Daubert Hearing reset for 2/13/2020 at 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 6D before Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/31/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Jack P. Burden, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 6918 BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN 3050 South Durango Drive Las Vegas, NV 89117 Tel: (702) 872-5555 Fax: (702) 872-5545 jburden@backuslaw.com shirleyjin@backuslaw.com Attorneys for Defendant The Vons Companies, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 FRANCINE SCOLARO, Case No. 2:17-cv-01979-JAD-VCF 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 THE VONS COMPANIES, INC., 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DAUBERT HEARING (SECOND REQUEST) Defendant The Vons Companies, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through its counsel of record, 16 the law firm of BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN, and Plaintiff Francine Scolaro (“Plaintiff”), by 17 and through her counsel of record, the law firm of BLACK & LOBELLO, hereby state, stipulate and 18 agree as follows: 19 1. On December 27, 2019, the Court issued an Order Overruling Plaintiff’s Objection, 20 Denying Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Deferring Ruling on 21 Motion in Limine (ECF No. 56) in which the Court ordered, among other things, that a 22 Daubert hearing is set for January 17, 2020, at 9 a.m. to determine the admissibility 23 and reliability of Plaintiff’s expert, Kimberly Ann Phillips’ causation opinion. 24 25 2. On January 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Continuance of Daubert Hearing (First Request) (ECF No. 57) requesting that the Daubert hearing be continued as Ms. 1 1 2 Phillips was unavailable on January 17, 2020 due to previously arranged travel plans. 3. On January 8, 2020, Defendant filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion 3 for Continuance of Daubert Hearing (First Request) (ECF No. 58) stating that 4 Defendant has no opposition to Plaintiff’s request to continue the Daubert hearing and 5 provided the Court with defense counsel’s unavailable dates. However, defense 6 counsel inadvertently omitted February 7, 2020 as an unavailable date and he is going 7 to be out of town on that date. 8 9 10 4. On January 9, 2020, the Court issued a Minute Order continuing the Daubert hearing to February 7, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. 5. As defense counsel is unavailable on February 7, 2020, the parties respectfully request 11 that the Court continue the Daubert hearing to a date and time after February 7, 2020. 12 Both counsel and Ms. Phillips are available on February 10, 13, and 14. 13 14 15 6. The parties agree and stipulate to the foregoing in good faith and not for purposes of delay. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 17 DATED this 28th day of January, 2020. DATED this 28th day of January, 2020. 18 BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN BLACK & LOBELLO /s/ Jack P. Burden Jack P. Burden, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 6918 Xiao Wen Jin, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 13901 3050 South Durango Drive Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorneys for Defendant /s/ Steve Mack Steve Mack, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 4000 10777 W. Twain Ave., Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89135 Attorneys for Plaintiff 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 Upon review of the Stipulation by the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby orders as follows: IT IS HERBY ORDERED that the Daubert hearing currently set for February 7, 2020 is VACATED and CONTINUED to _______________, _____, 2020 at ______ __.m. February 13, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. DATED this 31st day of ____ day of ____________________, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED this January, 2020. 7 ______________________________________ DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 Respectfully submitted by: 12 BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN 13 14 15 16 17 ___________________________ Jack P. Burden, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 6918 Xiao Wen Jin, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 13901 3050 South Durango Drive Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorneys for Defendant 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?