Flores v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
37
ORDER granting 36 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines. Discovery due by 4/10/2018. Motions due by 5/8/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/5/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BRIAN D. NETTLES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7462
CHRISTIAN M. MORRIS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11218
EDWARD J. WYNDER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13991
NETTLES LAW FIRM
1389 Galleria Drive, Suite 200
Henderson, Nevada 89014
Telephone: (702) 434-8282
Facsimile: (702) 434-1488
brian@nettleslawfirm.com
christian@nettleslawfirm.com
edward@nettleslawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
1 3 8 9 Ga ll e ri a Dri v e Su i te 2 0 0
He n d e r s o n, NV 8 9 0 1 4
( 7 0 2 ) 4 3 4 - 8 2 8 2 / ( 7 0 2) 4 3 4- 1 4 8 8 ( f ax )
NETTLES LAW FIRM
10
STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
ROBERT FLORES, an individual,
CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-01991-JAD-NJK
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
vs.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., a foreign
corporation d/b/a Wal-Mart Neighborhood
Market #3355; JONATHAN SOROLA, an
individual; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive; ROE
CORPORATIONS 11 through 20, inclusive; and
ABC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES 21
through 30, inclusive,
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DISCOVERY DEADLINES (FIRST
REQUEST)
Defendant(s).
22
Plaintiff, Robert Flores (“
Plaintiff” by and through his counsels of record, Brian D.
),
23
Nettles, Esq. Christian M. Morris, Esq., and Edward J. Wynder, Esq., of Nettles Law Firm, and
24
Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market #3355 (“
Defendant”
),
25
by and through its counsel of record, Timothy D. Kuhls, Esq., Esq., of Phillips, Spallas &
26
Angstadt, LLC, hereby stipulate to the extension of all remaining discovery deadlines by sixty
27
(60) days pursuant to LR 26-4.
28
-1-
1
STIPULATED APPLICATION
2
WHEREAS, the parties have begun discovery but still have substantial discovery to
3
complete before they will be ready for trial, the parties request a sixty (60) day extension of
4
certain discovery deadlines as set forth below.
5
A. DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE
6
1. The parties participated in the Fed. R. Civ. P 26(f) conference on August 15, 2017.
7
2. Plaintiff made his pre-discovery disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 26.1(a)(1) on
8
August 28, 2017. Defendant served its pre-discovery disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
9
P. 26.1(a)(1) on September 15, 2017.
1 3 8 9 Ga ll e ri a Dri v e Su i te 2 0 0
He n d e r s o n, NV 8 9 0 1 4
( 7 0 2 ) 4 3 4 - 8 2 8 2 / ( 7 0 2) 4 3 4- 1 4 8 8 ( f ax )
NETTLES LAW FIRM
10
3. Defendant propounded written discovery to Plaintiff on September 18, 2017 and Plaintiff
11
responded to Requests for Admissions on October 11, 2017 and Requests for Production
12
of Documents on October 16, 2017 and Interrogatories on October 16, 2017.
13
4. Plaintiff propounded written discovery to Defendant on November 1, 2017.
14
B. SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED
15
Plaintiff has been unable to designate a medical expert or produce a report due to
16
scheduling conflicts of the expert. Defendant’ responses to Plaintiff’ written discovery is due
s
s
17
December 1, 2017. The parties have conducted one deposition of Defendant’ girlfriend, the
s
18
deposition of one of Defendant’ employees is currently scheduled. The parties intend to depose
s
19
several individuals including Plaintiff, Defendant’ Rule 30(b)(6) designee(s), treating medical
s
20
professionals, expert witnesses and other employees of Defendant.
21
22
C. REASONS FOR EXTENSION TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY
Despite the good faith efforts of the parties to comply with the Court’ discovery
s
23
deadlines, various scheduling conflicts have occurred.
24
experienced a delay in producing a medical expert report due to the scheduling conflicts of the
25
medical expert. Accordingly, the parties believe a sixty (60) day extension to discovery is
26
warranted and prudent. This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
27
28
-2-
As set forth above, Plaintiff has
1
2
D. PROPOSED NEW DISCOVERY PLAN DEADLINES
Last date to complete discovery:
3
Currently: Friday, February 9, 2018
4
Proposed: Tuesday, April 10, 2018
5
Last date to amend pleadings and add parties:
6
Currently: Friday, November 10, 2017
7
Proposed: Tuesday, January 9, 2018
8
9
1 3 8 9 Ga ll e ri a Dri v e Su i te 2 0 0
He n d e r s o n, NV 8 9 0 1 4
( 7 0 2 ) 4 3 4 - 8 2 8 2 / ( 7 0 2) 4 3 4- 1 4 8 8 ( f ax )
NETTLES LAW FIRM
10
11
Last date to disclose experts pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2):
Currently: Monday, December 11, 2017
Proposed: Friday, February 9, 2018
Last date to disclose rebuttal experts:
12
Currently: Wednesday, January 10, 2018
13
Proposed: Monday, March 12, 2018
14
Last date to file interim status report:
15
Currently: Monday, December 11, 2017
16
Proposed: Friday, February 9, 2018
17
Last date to file dispositive motions:
18
Currently: Friday, March 9, 2018
19
Proposed: Tuesday, May 8, 2018
20
Last date to file joint pretrial order:
21
Currently: Friday, April 6, 2018
22
Proposed: Tuesday, June 5, 2018
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
CONCLUSION
1
2
Therefore, based upon the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that this Stipulation
3
to Extend Discovery (First Request) be granted and that the Court adopt the proposed dates
4
mentioned above.
5
DATED this 9th day of November, 2017.
DATED this 9th day of November, 2017.
NETTLES LAW FIRM
PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLC
/s/ Christian M. Morris, Esq.
BRIAN D. NETTLES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7462
CHRISTIAN M. MORRIS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11218
EDWARD J. WYNDER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13991
Attorneys for Plaintiff
/s/ Timothy D. Kuhls, Esq.
TIMOTHY D. KUHLS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13362
Attorneys for Defendant
6
7
8
9
1 3 8 9 Ga ll e ri a Dri v e Su i te 2 0 0
He n d e r s o n, NV 8 9 0 1 4
( 7 0 2 ) 4 3 4 - 8 2 8 2 / ( 7 0 2) 4 3 4- 1 4 8 8 ( f ax )
NETTLES LAW FIRM
10
11
12
13
Case Name: Flores v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Case Number: 2:17-cv-01991-JAD-NJK
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED:
17
Dated: November 13, 2017
18
19
20
________________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
DATED: ________________________________________
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?