Flores v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 41

ORDER that 40 Stipulation Regarding FRCP 35 Examination of Plaintiff is DENIED as unnecessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 ROBERT FLORES, 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 v. 13 WAL-MART STORES INC., 14 Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:17-cv-01991-JAD-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 40) 16 Pending before the Court is the stipulation that Plaintiff will submit to an independent medical 17 examination, as well as the agreed upon procedures for that examination. Docket No. 40. Unless doing 18 so interferes with Court proceedings, parties are generally permitted to stipulate to discovery procedures 19 without obtaining Court approval. Fed. R. Civ. P. 29. The pending stipulation fails to explain why 20 Court approval is necessary in this instance. Accordingly, the stipulation is DENIED as unnecessary. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: February 8, 2018 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?