Bank of New York Mellon v. Day Spring Property Owners Association

Filing 21

ORDER granting 13 Stipulation; Re: 11 Motion to Dismiss, Responses due by 3/10/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-01992-JCM-GWF Document 20 Filed 02/16/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEELE, LLP Shadd A. Wade, Esq. Nevada Bar 11310 3753 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Tel: (702) 948-8565 Fax: (702) 446-9898 swade@zbslaw.com Attorneys for plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York, As Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-12 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE CWABS INC., ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-12, a national bank, 15 16 17 18 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 11] FIRST REQUESTED EXTENSION Plaintiff, 14 CASE NO.: 2:17-CV-01992-JCM-GWF vs. DAY SPRING PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit corporation, Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York, As Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-12 (“BNYM”) by and through Shadd A. Wade, Esq. of the law firm Zieve, Brodnax & Steele, LLP, and Defendant DAY SPRING PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, (“Defendant”) by and through Eric N. Tran, Esq. of the law firm Lipson, Neilson, Cole, Seltzer & Garin, P.C., hereby agree and stipulate as follows: Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was filed on January 25, 2018 at ECF No. 11. The deadline for Plaintiff to file their response was February 8, 2018. 28 Page 1 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-01992-JCM-GWF Document 20 Filed 02/16/18 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that the time to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss be extended by 30 days, making the filing due date for a response March 10, 2018. This is the first stipulation for extension of time to file a response to Defendant’s Motion 4 to Dismiss. Plaintiff requests the additional time to explore settlement of the case with 5 Defendant’s newly-retained counsel. 6 Dated: February 8, 2018 Dated: February 8, 2018 ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEELE, LLP LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER & GARIN, P.C. By:/s/Shadd A. Wade, Esq. Shadd A. Wade, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11310 J. Stephen Dolembo, Esq. Nevada Bar 9795 swade@zbslaw.com sdolembo@zbslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon By:_/s/Eric Tran, Esq.____________________ Eric N. Tran, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11876 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Attorney for Defendant, Day Spring Property Owners Association 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED February 21, 2018. this day of , 2018. 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 Respectfully submitted: 22 ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEELE, LLP 23 24 25 26 By: Shadd A. Wade_____________ Shadd A. Wade, Esq. Nevada Bar 11310 swade@zbslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2006-13 27 28 Page 2 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-01992-JCM-GWF Document 20 Filed 02/16/18 Page 3 of 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 5(b) and Electronic Filing Procedure IV(B), I certify that on the 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 16th day of February, 2018 a true and correct copy of the STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 11] was transmitted electronically through the Court’s e-filing electronic system to the attorney(s) associated with this case.   Eric N. Tran, Esq. LIPSON NEILSON, P.C. 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Attorney for Defendant 11 12 13 /s/Sara Aslinger An Employee of ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEELE, LLP 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?