Bank of New York Mellon v. Day Spring Property Owners Association
Filing
21
ORDER granting 13 Stipulation; Re: 11 Motion to Dismiss, Responses due by 3/10/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:17-cv-01992-JCM-GWF Document 20 Filed 02/16/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEELE, LLP
Shadd A. Wade, Esq.
Nevada Bar 11310
3753 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Tel: (702) 948-8565
Fax: (702) 446-9898
swade@zbslaw.com
Attorneys for plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York, As Trustee
for the Certificateholders of the CWABS Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-12
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS
TRUSTEE
FOR
THE
CERTIFICATEHOLDERS
OF
THE
CWABS
INC.,
ASSET-BACKED
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-12, a
national bank,
15
16
17
18
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 11]
FIRST REQUESTED EXTENSION
Plaintiff,
14
CASE NO.: 2:17-CV-01992-JCM-GWF
vs.
DAY SPRING PROPERTY OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation,
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York, As Trustee for the
Certificateholders of the CWABS Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-12 (“BNYM”) by
and through Shadd A. Wade, Esq. of the law firm Zieve, Brodnax & Steele, LLP, and Defendant
DAY SPRING PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, (“Defendant”) by and through Eric N.
Tran, Esq. of the law firm Lipson, Neilson, Cole, Seltzer & Garin, P.C., hereby agree and
stipulate as follows:
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was filed on January 25, 2018 at ECF No. 11. The
deadline for Plaintiff to file their response was February 8, 2018.
28
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-cv-01992-JCM-GWF Document 20 Filed 02/16/18 Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that the time to respond to Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss be extended by 30 days, making the filing due date for a response March 10, 2018.
This is the first stipulation for extension of time to file a response to Defendant’s Motion
4
to Dismiss. Plaintiff requests the additional time to explore settlement of the case with
5
Defendant’s newly-retained counsel.
6
Dated: February 8, 2018
Dated: February 8, 2018
ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEELE, LLP
LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER &
GARIN, P.C.
By:/s/Shadd A. Wade, Esq.
Shadd A. Wade, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11310
J. Stephen Dolembo, Esq.
Nevada Bar 9795
swade@zbslaw.com
sdolembo@zbslaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff The Bank of New
York Mellon
By:_/s/Eric Tran, Esq.____________________
Eric N. Tran, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11876
9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Attorney for Defendant, Day Spring
Property Owners Association
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED February 21, 2018.
this
day of
, 2018.
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
Respectfully submitted:
22
ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEELE, LLP
23
24
25
26
By: Shadd A. Wade_____________
Shadd A. Wade, Esq.
Nevada Bar 11310
swade@zbslaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for
the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2006-13
27
28
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:17-cv-01992-JCM-GWF Document 20 Filed 02/16/18 Page 3 of 3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 5(b) and Electronic Filing Procedure IV(B), I certify that on the
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
16th day of February, 2018 a true and correct copy of the STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 11] was
transmitted electronically through the Court’s e-filing electronic system to the attorney(s)
associated with this case.
Eric N. Tran, Esq.
LIPSON NEILSON, P.C.
9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Attorney for Defendant
11
12
13
/s/Sara Aslinger
An Employee of ZIEVE, BRODNAX & STEELE, LLP
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?