United States of America for the use and benefit of American General Construction Inc. et al v. Yack Construction, Inc. et al

Filing 50

ORDER granting ECF No. 49 Stipulation to Extend re ECF Nos. 47 and 48 Motions for Summary Judgment (First Request): Responses due by 12/21/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) Modified on 12/7/2018 replies due 1/11/2019 (WJ).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Edward D. Boyack Nevada Bar No. 005229 Colli C. McKiever Nevada Bar No. 13724 BOYACK ORME & ANTHONY 7432 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 101 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Telephone: (702) 562-3415 Facsimile: (702) 562-3570 ted@boyacklaw.com colli@boyacklaw.com Attorney for Defendants YACK CONSTRUCTION INC. And MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF AMERICAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC. and AMERICAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC. dba AGC, INC., Plaintiffs, 13 14 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS TO OPPOSE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS vs. 15 Case No. 2:17-cv-01994-MMD-CWH YACK CONSTRUCTION INC., and MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) 16 (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 17 18 Pursuant to LR 6-1, Defendants, YACK CONSTRUCTION INC. (“YACK”), and 19 MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL),and Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF 20 AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF AMERICAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, 21 22 INC. and AMERICAN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC. (“AGC”) , by and through their undersigned counsel, respectfully submit this Stipulation to allow both the Plaintiffs and the Defendants fourteen (14) additional days file oppositions to the competing summary judgments 23 24 25 26 27 filed on November 16th, 2018, and an additional seven (7) days for the parties to file any replies. The Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Defendants, YACK and MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY filed their Motion for Summary Judgment on November 16th, 2018. [ECF NO. 47] 2. Plaintiffs, AGC, filed their Motion for Summary Judgment on November 16th, 28 Page 1 of 2 1 2018. [ECF NO. 48] 2 3. Currently both parties’ Oppositions are due December 7th, 2018. 3 4. The parties stipulate and agree that AGC shall have up to, through, and 4 including December 21st, 2018, to oppose YACK and MERCHANTS BONDING 5 COMPANY’s Summary Judgment motion [ECF No. 47]. 6 5. The parties stipulate and agree that YACK and MERCHANTS BONDING 7 COMPANY shall have up to, through, and including December 21st, 2018, to oppose 8 AGC’s Summary Judgment motion [ECF No. 48]. 9 6. AGC, YACK and MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY further agree 10 and stipulate that all parties shall have up to, through, and including January 11th, 2019, to 11 file any replies. 12 7. The additional time will allow the parties to properly address the issues 13 raised in the motions in light of the intervening holidays during the briefing of the motions 14 for summary judgment. No prejudice will result to any party from an extension of time. 15 8. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. 16 17 DATED this 5th day of December, 2018. DATED this 5th day of December, 2018 18 BOYACK ORME & ANTHONY GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP 19 By: ___/s/ Edward D. Boyack _______ EDWARD D. BOYACK Nevada Bar No. 005229 COLLI C. McKIEVER Nevada Bar No. 13724 7432 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 101 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Attorneys for Defendants By: /s/ Christopher R. Miltenberger MARK E. FERRARIO Nevada Bar No. 1625 CHRISTOPHER R. MILTENBERGER Nevada Bar No. 10153 WHITNEY WELCH-KIRMSE Nevada Bar No. 12129 3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 400 North Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED THIS ________ DAY OF DECEMBER, 2018. 6th ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?