Keenan et al v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company

Filing 12

ORDER Granting 11 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines (First Request). Discovery due by 4/20/2018. Motions due by 5/21/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/21/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6

GEORGE M. RANALLI, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5748
BENJAMIN J. CARMAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12565
RANALLI ZANIEL FOWLER & MORAN, LLC
2400 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

HENDERSON, NEVADA 89052
TELEPHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

2400 W. HORIZON RIDGE PARKWAY

RANALLI ZANIEL FOWLER & MORAN, LLC

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10

CHARLES KEENAN, Individually;
TAMMY KEENAN, individually;

2:17-cv-01999-RFB-VCF

11
Plaintiff,
12
*SUBMITTED IN COMPLIANCE
WITH LR 26-1(e)*

v.
13
14
15

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES I-X,
and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X,
inclusive

16

Defendant

17
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES
(FIRST REQUEST)

18
19

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4, the parties, by and
20
through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to
21
and request that the Court extend the deadlines by sixty days.
22
A.
23
24
25

STATEMENT SPECIFING THE DISCOVERY COMPLETED:

1
2

The following discovery has been completed by the parties:
1.

3
4

2.

3.

HENDERSON, NEVADA 89052
TELEPHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

2400 W. HORIZON RIDGE PARKWAY

RANALLI ZANIEL FOWLER & MORAN, LLC

pursuant

to

FRCP

Plaintiff’s

Initial

Disclosure,

pursuant

to

FRCP

Defendant’s

First

Supplemental

Initial

Disclosure,

pursuant to FRCP 26(f);
4.

9
10

Disclosure,

26(f);

7
8

Initial

26(f);

5
6

Defendant’s

Defendant’s First Set of Request

for Admissions to

Plaintiff, Charles Keenan;
5.

11

Defendant’s First Set of Request for Admissions to
Plaintiff, Tammy Keenan;

12

6.

Plaintiff’s Requests for Admissions to Defendant;

13

7.

Plaintiff,

14
15

Keenan,

Responses

to

Defendant’s

to

Defendant’s

Requests for Admissions;
8.

16
17

Charles

Plaintiff,

Tammy

Keenan,

Responses

Requests for Admissions;
9.

18

Defendant’s

Responses

to

Plaintiff’s

Requests

for

Admissions;

19

10.

Plaintiff’s Interrogatories to Defendant;

20

11.

Defendant’s

21
22
23
24
25

Interrogatories

to

Plaintiff,

Charles

Keenan;
12.

Defendant’s
Keenan;

Interrogatories

to

Plaintiff,

Tammy

1

13.

2
3

Plaintiff,

Charles

Keenan,

Responses

to

Defendant’s

to

Defendant’s

Interrogatories;
14.

4

Plaintiff,

Tammy

Keenan,

Responses

Interrogatories;

5

15.

Defendant’s Responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories;

6

16.

Defendant’s

7

HENDERSON, NEVADA 89052
TELEPHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

2400 W. HORIZON RIDGE PARKWAY

RANALLI ZANIEL FOWLER & MORAN, LLC

8

17.

18.

19.

20.

to

Defendant’s

Request

Production

of

Documents

to

Production

for

Plaintiff’s

Request

for

of

Documents

to

Plaintiff,

Charles

Keenan,

Responses

to

Defendant’s

Plaintiff,

Tammy

Keenan,

Responses

to

Defendant’s

Request for Production of Documents;
21.

17
18

Documents

Request for Production of Documents;

15
16

of

Defendant;

13
14

Production

Plaintiff, Tammy Keenan;

11
12

for

Plaintiff, Charles Keenan;

9
10

Request

Defendant’s

Responses

to

Plaintiff’s

Request

for

Production of Documents;
B. A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE

19

COMPLETED:

20

1.

Depositions

of

the

Person

Most

21

Plaintiff’s

medical

22

rendered to Plaintiff since the date of this accident;

providers

Knowledgeable

relevant

to

23

2.

Deposition of Plaintiff;

24

3.

Deposition of Defendant’s representatives;

25

from

treatment

1

4.

Disclosures of Plaintiff and Defendant’s experts;

2

5.

Depositions of Plaintiff and Defendant’s experts;

3

6.

Independent

4

Medical

Examination

of

Plaintiff,

Keenan;

5

A.

6

WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SET BY THE DISCOVERY ORDER:

7

THE REASONS WHY THE DISCOVERY REMAINING WAS NOT COMPLETED

Both

parties

HENDERSON, NEVADA 89052
TELEPHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

2400 W. HORIZON RIDGE PARKWAY

8
RANALLI ZANIEL FOWLER & MORAN, LLC

Tammy

matter forward.

9

requesting

an

have

been

working

diligently

to

move

this

At this time both parties are requesting are
additional

sixty

days

to

obtain

experts.

Both

10

parties believe that the additional time will allow the parties

11

to retain their experts during the holiday time, obtain the

12

remaining

13

Examination of Plaintiff, Tammy Keenan.

14

believe

15

potential settlement conference and early resolution of this

16

dispute.

17

D.

depositions

that

this

will

and

perform

better

an

position

Independent

Further, the parties
the

parties

for

a

A PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING ALL REMAINING DISCOVERY:
Old Deadline

18

New Deadline

19

Discovery Cut off:

02/19/18

04/20/2018

20

Amending Pleadings
& Adding Parties:

11/21/17

CLOSED

22

Expert Disclosure:

12/21/17

02/19/2018

23

Rebuttal of Experts:

01/17/2018

03/21/2018

24

Interim Status Report:

12/21/2017

02/19/2018

21

25

Medical

1

Dispositive Motions:

2

F. SAID REQUEST IS NOT BEING MADE FOR PURPOSES OF UNDULY DELAYIN

3

DISCOVERY OR THE TRIAL OF THIS MATTER.

4

Dated:

5
6
7

HENDERSON, NEVADA 89052
TELEPHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

2400 W. HORIZON RIDGE PARKWAY

RANALLI ZANIEL FOWLER & MORAN, LLC

8
9
10

03/20/2018

December 5th, 2017

Dated:

05/21/2018

December 5th, 2017

RANALLI ZANIEL FOWLER & MORAN,
LLC

GLEN LERNER INJURY ATTORNEYS

/s/ Benjamin J. Carman______
GEORGE M. RANALLI, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5748
BENJAMIN J. CARMAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12565
2400 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway
Henderson, Nevada 89052
Attorneys for Defendant

/s/ Joshua L. Benson________
JOSHUA L. BENSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10514
4795 South Durango Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89147
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
Charles Keenan and
Tammy Keenan

11

ORDER

12
13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED:
12-6-2017
Dated: _______________
____________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

The Joint Pretrial Order is due June 21, 2018. If dispositive motions are filed, the deadline
for filing the joint pretrial order will be suspended until 30 days after decision on the dispositive
motions or further court order.