Thomas v. Smith-Palluck Associates Corp.

Filing 70

ORDER granting ECF No. 69 Stipulation to Extend Time re ECF No. 64 Motion to Dismiss (First Request). Plaintiff's response due by 6/19/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
5510 So. Fort Apache Rd, Suite 30
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

17

ANDREA THOMAS,

Case No.: 2:17-cv-02001-MMD-CWH

18
19
20
21
22
23

vs.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS

SMITH-PALLUCK ASSOCIATES CORP.,
d/b/a LAS VEGAS ATHLETIC CLUBS,

[FIRST REQUEST]

Plaintiff,

24

Defendants.
Plaintiff Andrea Thomas (“Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel of record, and Defendant

25

Smith-Palluck Associates Corp., d/b/a Las Vegas Athletic Clubs (“LVAC”) have agreed and

26
27
28

stipulated to the following:
1.

On July 24, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1].

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST] - 1

1

2.

On September 14, 2017, LVAC filed an Answer to the Complaint [ECF Dkt.5].

2

3.

On February 7, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend the Complaint [ECF Dkt.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

17] and briefing was completed on February 28, 2018 [ECF Dkt. 23].
4.

On July 17, 2018 LVAC filed a Motion to Stay Case [ECF Dkt. 38].

5.

On September 6, 2018, the Court granted LVAC’s Motion to Stay Case and denied

Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint [ECF Dkt. 42].
6.

On April 2, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to file First Amended

Complaint [ECF Dkt. 51].
7.

On April 12, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion to file First Amended

Complaint as moot [ECF Dkt. 54].
8.

On April 13, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Notice Re-Urging her Motion for Leave to File

First Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 55].
9.

On May 14, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Notice Re-Urging her Motion for

Leave to File First Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 61].

18

10.

On May 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 62].

19

11.

On May 29, 2019, LVAC filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended

20
21
22
23

Complaint [ECF Dkt. 64].
12.

Plaintiff’s Response is due June 12, 2019.

13.

Plaintiff and LVAC have agreed to extend Plaintiff’s response seven days in order

24

to allow Plaintiff’s counsel additional time to respond due to a conflict stemming from an out of

25

state court hearing in Alaska at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. As a result, both Plaintiff and

26

LVAC hereby request this Court to further extend the date for Plaintiff to respond to LVAC’s

27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST] - 2

1

Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint until June 19, 2019. This stipulation is made in good

2

faith, is not interposed for delay, and is not filed for an improper purpose.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated June 11, 2019.
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC

BALLARD SPAHR LLP

/s/ Miles N. Clark
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
5510 So. Fort Apache Rd, Suite 30
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

/s/ Stacy H. Rubin
Joel E. Tasca, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14124
Lindsay C. Demaree, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11949
Stacy H. Rubin, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9298
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 900
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

HAINES & KRIEGER LLC
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Email: [e-mail]

Counsel for Defendant
Smith-Palluck Associates Corp., d/b/a Las
Vegas Athletic Clubs

Counsel for Plaintiff
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
MOTION TO DISMISS
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
June 11, 2019
Dated: _______________

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST] - 3