Mathieu v. America's Servicing Co. et al
Filing
13
ORDER Granting 10 Stipulation to Extend Time. America's Servicing Co. answer due 9/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/18/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-02003-APG-CWH Document 10 Filed 08/14/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
Kelly H. Dove (Nevada Bar No. 10569)
Karl O. Riley (Nevada Bar No. 12077)
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: 702.784.5200
Facsimile: 702.784.5252
Email: kdove@swlaw.com
kriley@swlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
erroneously named as America’s Servicing Co.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
ALTES H. MATHIEU,
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
Case No.:
12
13
14
15
16
17
2:17-cv-02003-APG-CWH
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICA’S SERVICING CO.;
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
FEDERAL CREDIT UNION;
SONEPCO FEDERAL CREDIT
UNION; EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES, LLC; TRANS UNION,
LLC,
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
19
20
Plaintiff Altes H. Mathieu (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
21
erroneously named as America’s Servicing Co. (“Wells Fargo,” together with Plaintiff, the
22
“Parties”) agrees, by and through their attorneys, to stipulate to extend the time for Wells Fargo to
23
respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
24
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint on July 24, 2017;
25
WHEREAS, Plaintiff served Wells Fargo on July 27, 2017, making Wells Fargo’s
26
response to the Complaint is due August 17, 2017;
27
WHEREAS, this request is timely;
28
///
-14834-2663-1757
Case 2:17-cv-02003-APG-CWH Document 10 Filed 08/14/17 Page 2 of 3
1
2
WHEREAS, Wells Fargo needs additional time to procure information to respond to the
Complaint;
3
4
WHEREAS, Wells Fargo requested, and Plaintiff agreed, to extend Wells Fargo’s time to
respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint;
5
6
WHEREAS, this request is not made for purposes of delay and is supported by good
cause;
7
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS
///
10
///
11
Snell & Wilmer
HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties as follows:
9
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
8
///
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-24834-2663-1757
Case 2:17-cv-02003-APG-CWH Document 10 Filed 08/14/17 Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1.
Wells Fargo will respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before September 11,
2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: August 14, 2017.
Dated: August 14, 2017.
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
By: /s/ David Krieger
David H. Krieger, Esq.
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
(signed with permission)
By: /s/ Karl O. Riley
Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Karl O. Riley, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12077
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Plaintiff Altes H. Mathieu
Dated: August 14, 2017.
Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., erroneously named as America’s
Servicing Co.
Dated: August 14, 2017.
By: /s/ Robert S. Larsen
Robert S. Larsen, Esq.
Wing Y. Wong, Esq.
GORDON & REES LLP
300 South Fourth Street, Suite 1500
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(signed with permission)
By: /s/ Jason Revzin
Jason Revzin, Esq.
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
LLP
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89118
(signed with permission)
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Attorneys for Southern California Edison
Federal Credit Union and Sonepco Federal
Credit Union
Attorney for TransUnion
20
ORDER
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo shall respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before
September 11, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 18, 2017.
__,
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
-34834-2663-1757
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?