Chamaria et al v. Diab et al

Filing 28

ORDER Granting 27 Stipulation to Extend Time re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. ( Responses due by 8/22/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/16/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 27 Filed 08/13/17 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5

ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD.
Alexis L. Brown (No. 12338)
725 S. 8th St., Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10
11

VISHAL CHAMARIA, an individual;
VIVEK CHAMARIA, an individual; PUJA
CHAMARIA, an individual; GAURI
CHAMARIA, an individual; P & V, LLC, a
California limited liability company; CHIP
SHOP, LLC, a California limited liability
company,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Case No.: 2:17-CV-02023-JAD-CWH

vs.
TONY M. DIAB, an individual; SHOOK,
HARDY & BACON, L.L.P., a Missouri
limited liability partnership; MATTHEW
GREGORY JONES, an individual; G & M
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a
California corporation, dba JONES REAL
ESTATE; DOES I through X, individuals;
and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X,
inclusive,
Defendants.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO
DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (DKT. 10)
(First Request)

22

Plaintiffs VISHAL CHAMARIA, VIVEK CHAMARIA, PUJA CHARMARIA, GAURI

23

CHAMARIA, P & V, LLC, and CHIP SHOP, LLC (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), by and through

24

their attorney of record ALEXIS L. BROWN, ESQ. of the law office of ALEXIS BROWN LAW,

25

CHTD., and Defendant TONY M. DIAB, Defendant in Proper Person, hereby enter into this

26

stipulation to extend time pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 and L.R. IA 6-1 as follows:

27
28
1

Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 27 Filed 08/13/17 Page 2 of 3

1

WHEREAS on July 31, 2017, Mr. Diab filed Defendant Tony M. Diab’s Notice of Motion

2

and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities

3

Thereon (the “Diab Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. 10).

4
5

WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ response to the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10) is currently due
on August 14, 2017.

6

WHEREAS on August 8, 2017, Defendants Matthew Gregory Jones and G & M

7

Management Services, Inc. (the “Jones Defendants”) filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to

8

Dismiss Complaint Against Defendants Matthew Gregory Jones and G & M Management

9

Services, Inc. for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (the “Jones Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt.

10

20).

11
12

WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ response to the Jones Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 20) is
due August 22, 2017.

13

WHEREAS Plaintiffs assert that jurisdiction over Mr. Diab and the Jones Defendants is

14

intertwined and, as such, Plaintiffs wish to collectively address the jurisdictional arguments raised

15

in both the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10) and Jones Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 20).

16

WHEREAS Defendant Diab agrees to allow Plaintiffs this first requested extension until

17

August 22, 2017 to respond to the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10).

18

///

19

///

20

///

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 27 Filed 08/13/17 Page 3 of 3

1

Based on the foregoing,

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that good cause exists to allow Plaintiffs until August 22,

3
4

2017 to respond to the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10).
DATED this 13th day of August, 2017.

5

ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD.

6
7

/s/ Alexis L. Brown
By: _________________________________
Alexis L. Brown (No. 12338)

8

Attorney for Plaintiffs

9

DATED this 13th day of August, 2017.

10
11
12

/s/ Tony M. Diab
By: _________________________________
Tony M. Diab, Defendant in Proper Person

13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

17

DATED:

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

8/16/2017