Chamaria et al v. Diab et al

Filing 32

ORDER Granting 29 Stipulation to Extend Time re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Responses due by 8/30/2017; Replies due by 9/8/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 29 Filed 08/22/17 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5

ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD.
Alexis L. Brown (No. 12338)
725 S. 8th St., Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10
11

VISHAL CHAMARIA, an individual;
VIVEK CHAMARIA, an individual; PUJA
CHAMARIA, an individual; GAURI
CHAMARIA, an individual; P & V, LLC, a
California limited liability company; CHIP
SHOP, LLC, a California limited liability
company,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

ORDER

Plaintiffs,

12
13

Case No.: 2:17-CV-02023-JAD-CWH

vs.
TONY M. DIAB, an individual; SHOOK,
HARDY & BACON, L.L.P., a Missouri
limited liability partnership; MATTHEW
GREGORY JONES, an individual; G & M
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a
California corporation, dba JONES REAL
ESTATE; DOES I through X, individuals;
and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X,
inclusive,
Defendants.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO
DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (DKT. 10)
(Second Request)

22

Plaintiffs VISHAL CHAMARIA, VIVEK CHAMARIA, PUJA CHARMARIA, GAURI

23

CHAMARIA, P & V, LLC, and CHIP SHOP, LLC (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), by and through

24

their attorney of record ALEXIS L. BROWN, ESQ. of the law office of ALEXIS BROWN LAW,

25

CHTD., and Defendant TONY M. DIAB, Defendant in Proper Person, hereby enter into this

26

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

27

(Dkt. 10) (Second Request) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 and L.R. IA 6-1 as follows:

28
1

Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 29 Filed 08/22/17 Page 2 of 3

1

WHEREAS on July 31, 2017, Mr. Diab filed Defendant Tony M. Diab’s Notice of Motion

2

and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities

3

Thereon (the “Diab Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. 10).

4

WHEREAS pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting [27] Stipulation to Extend Time re

5

[10] MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Dkt. 28), Plaintiffs’ response to the Diab

6

Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10) is currently due on August 22, 2017.

7

WHEREAS shortly before Plaintiffs and Diab agreed to the first extension of time to

8

respond to the Diab Motion to Dismiss to August 22, 2017, the California Automobile Case

9

referred to in Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint reinstated and has required Mr. Diab’s and Plaintiffs’

10

attention.

11
12

WHEREAS as part of the discussions regarding the California Automobile Case, Mr. Diab
and Plaintiffs have also been engaging in settlement discussions regarding this case.

13
14

WHEREAS in light of the foregoing, Defendant Diab agrees to allow Plaintiffs this second
extension until August 30, 2017 to respond to the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10).

15

WHEREAS Mr. Diab has requested an extension of time through September 8, 2017 to

16

file his Reply in support of the Diab Motion to Dismiss due to a scheduling conflict from August

17

31, 2017 through September 4, 2017.

18

///

19

///

20

///

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 29 Filed 08/22/17 Page 3 of 3

1

Based on the foregoing,

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that good cause exists to allow Plaintiffs until August 30,

3
4
5
6

2017 to respond to the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10).
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that good cause exists to allow Mr. Diab until September
8, 2017 to file a reply in support of the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10).
DATED this 22nd day of August, 2017.

7

ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD.

8

/s/ Alexis L. Brown
By: _________________________________
Alexis L. Brown (No. 12338)

9
10
11
12
13

Attorney for Plaintiffs
DATED this 22nd day of August, 2017.
/s/ Tony M. Diab
By: _________________________________
Tony M. Diab, Defendant in Proper Person

14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
19

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8/23/2017
DATED:

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3