Chamaria et al v. Diab et al

Filing 45

ORDER Granting 44 Stipulation to Extend Time re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Replies due by 9/21/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/18/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 09/16/17 Page 1 of 4

1

3

Tony M. Diab
25961 Glen Canyon Dr.
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
[e-mail]
620-474-0301

4

in pro per

2

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11
12
13

VISHAL CHAMARIA, an individual;
VIVEK CHAMARIA, an individual; PUJA
CHAMARIA, an individual; GAURI
CHAMARIA, an individual; P & V, LLC, a
California limited liability company; CHIP
SHOP, LLC, a California limited liability
company,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Case No.: 2:17-CV-02023-JAD-CWH

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

vs.
TONY M. DIAB, an individual; SHOOK,
HARDY & BACON, L.L.P., a Missouri
limited liability partnership; MATTHEW
GREGORY JONES, an individual; G & M
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a
California corporation, dba JONES REAL
ESTATE; DOES I through X, individuals;
and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X,
inclusive,

(ECF No. 44)

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 09/16/17 Page 2 of 4

1
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (DKT. 10)
(Second Request)

3

Plaintiffs VISHAL CHAMARIA, VIVEK CHAMARIA, PUJA CHARMARIA, GAURI

4

CHAMARIA, P & V, LLC, and CHIP SHOP, LLC (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), by and through

5

their attorney of record ALEXIS L. BROWN, ESQ. of the law office of ALEXIS BROWN LAW,

6

CHTD., and Defendant TONY M. DIAB, Defendant in Proper Person, hereby enter into this

7

Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

8

(Dkt. 10) (Second Request) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 and L.R. IA 6-1 as follows:

9

WHEREAS on July 31, 2017, Mr. Diab filed Defendant Tony M. Diab’s Notice of Motion

10

and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities

11

Thereon (the “Diab Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. 10).

12
13

WHEREAS pursuant to Court orders, Plaintiffs’ response to the Diab Motion to Dismiss
(Dkt. 10) was due and filed September 8, 2017. Dkt. 28, 32, 38, 40.

14

WHEREAS the Parties previously agreed to extend the time for Mr. Diab to file his Reply

15

in Support of the Diab Motion to Dismiss from September 15, 2017 to September 18, 2017. Dkt.

16

28, 32, 40.

17
18

WHEREAS the Parties have resumed settlement discussions and believe that an amicable
resolution to their dispute is possible.

19

WHEREAS in light of the foregoing, the Parties stipulate and agree that Mr. Diab shall

20

have this second extension until and including September 21, 2017 to file his Reply in Support of

21

the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10).

22

Based on the foregoing,

23

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that good cause exists to allow Mr. Diab until September

24
25
26
27
28

21, 2017 to file a reply in support of the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10).
DATED this 15th day of September, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________
United States District Judge
Dated: September 18, 2017.

ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD.
/s/ Alexis Brown
By: _________________________________
Alexis L. Brown (No. 12338)
Attorney for Plaintiffs
2

Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 44 Filed 09/16/17 Page 3 of 4

1

DATED this 15th day of September, 2017.

2

/s/ Tony M. Diab
By: _________________________________
Tony M. Diab, Defendant in pro per

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9
10
11

DATED:

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3