Chamaria et al v. Diab et al

Filing 50

ORDER Granting 46 Stipulation to Extend Time re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Replies due by 9/22/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 46 Filed 09/21/17 Page 1 of 4 1 3 Tony M. Diab 25961 Glen Canyon Dr. Laguna Hills, CA 92653 620-474-0301 4 in pro per 2 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 13 VISHAL CHAMARIA, an individual; VIVEK CHAMARIA, an individual; PUJA CHAMARIA, an individual; GAURI CHAMARIA, an individual; P & V, LLC, a California limited liability company; CHIP SHOP, LLC, a California limited liability company, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No.: 2:17-CV-02023-JAD-CWH STIPULATION AND ORDER ECF No. 46 Plaintiffs, vs. TONY M. DIAB, an individual; SHOOK, HARDY & BACON, L.L.P., a Missouri limited liability partnership; MATTHEW GREGORY JONES, an individual; G & M MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, dba JONES REAL ESTATE; DOES I through X, individuals; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 46 Filed 09/21/17 Page 2 of 4 1 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (DKT. 10) (Third Request) 3 Plaintiffs VISHAL CHAMARIA, VIVEK CHAMARIA, PUJA CHARMARIA, GAURI 4 CHAMARIA, P & V, LLC, and CHIP SHOP, LLC (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), by and through 5 their attorney of record ALEXIS L. BROWN, ESQ. of the law office of ALEXIS BROWN LAW, 6 CHTD., and Defendant TONY M. DIAB, Defendant in Proper Person, hereby enter into this 7 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction 8 (Dkt. 10) (Third Request) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 and L.R. IA 6-1 as follows: 9 WHEREAS on July 31, 2017, Mr. Diab filed Defendant Tony M. Diab’s Notice of Motion 10 and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities 11 Thereon (the “Diab Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. 10). 12 13 WHEREAS pursuant to Court orders, Plaintiffs’ response to the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10) was due and filed September 8, 2017. (Dkt. 28, 32, 38, 40.) 14 WHEREAS the Parties previously agreed to extend the time for Mr. Diab to file his Reply 15 in Support of the Diab Motion to Dismiss from September 15, 2017 to September 18, 2017, and 16 then to September 21, 2017. (Dkt. 28, 32, 40, 44, 45.) 17 18 WHEREAS the Parties have resumed settlement discussions and believe that an amicable resolution to their dispute is possible. 19 WHEREAS in light of the foregoing, the Parties stipulate and agree that Mr. Diab shall 20 have this second extension until and including September 22, 2017 to file his Reply in Support of 21 the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10). 22 Based on the foregoing, 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that good cause exists to allow Mr. Diab until September 24 22, 2017 to file a reply in support of the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10). 25 26 27 28 DATED this 2017. 21st day of September, IT IS SO ORDERED. _____________________________ U.S. District Judge Jennifer Dorsey September 22, 2017 ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD. /s/ Alexis Brown By: _________________________________ Alexis L. Brown (No. 12338) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?