Chamaria et al v. Diab et al
ORDER Granting 46 Stipulation to Extend Time re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Replies due by 9/22/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 46 Filed 09/21/17 Page 1 of 4
Tony M. Diab
25961 Glen Canyon Dr.
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
in pro per
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
VISHAL CHAMARIA, an individual;
VIVEK CHAMARIA, an individual; PUJA
CHAMARIA, an individual; GAURI
CHAMARIA, an individual; P & V, LLC, a
California limited liability company; CHIP
SHOP, LLC, a California limited liability
Case No.: 2:17-CV-02023-JAD-CWH
ECF No. 46
TONY M. DIAB, an individual; SHOOK,
HARDY & BACON, L.L.P., a Missouri
limited liability partnership; MATTHEW
GREGORY JONES, an individual; G & M
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a
California corporation, dba JONES REAL
ESTATE; DOES I through X, individuals;
and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X,
Case 2:17-cv-02023-JAD-CWH Document 46 Filed 09/21/17 Page 2 of 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION (DKT. 10)
Plaintiffs VISHAL CHAMARIA, VIVEK CHAMARIA, PUJA CHARMARIA, GAURI
CHAMARIA, P & V, LLC, and CHIP SHOP, LLC (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), by and through
their attorney of record ALEXIS L. BROWN, ESQ. of the law office of ALEXIS BROWN LAW,
CHTD., and Defendant TONY M. DIAB, Defendant in Proper Person, hereby enter into this
Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
(Dkt. 10) (Third Request) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 and L.R. IA 6-1 as follows:
WHEREAS on July 31, 2017, Mr. Diab filed Defendant Tony M. Diab’s Notice of Motion
and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities
Thereon (the “Diab Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. 10).
WHEREAS pursuant to Court orders, Plaintiffs’ response to the Diab Motion to Dismiss
(Dkt. 10) was due and filed September 8, 2017. (Dkt. 28, 32, 38, 40.)
WHEREAS the Parties previously agreed to extend the time for Mr. Diab to file his Reply
in Support of the Diab Motion to Dismiss from September 15, 2017 to September 18, 2017, and
then to September 21, 2017. (Dkt. 28, 32, 40, 44, 45.)
WHEREAS the Parties have resumed settlement discussions and believe that an amicable
resolution to their dispute is possible.
WHEREAS in light of the foregoing, the Parties stipulate and agree that Mr. Diab shall
have this second extension until and including September 22, 2017 to file his Reply in Support of
the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10).
Based on the foregoing,
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that good cause exists to allow Mr. Diab until September
22, 2017 to file a reply in support of the Diab Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10).
21st day of September,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
U.S. District Judge Jennifer Dorsey
September 22, 2017
ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD.
/s/ Alexis Brown
Alexis L. Brown (No. 12338)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?