U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. v. Crocs, Inc. et al
Filing
82
ORDER that defendants have seven (7) days from the date of this order to either submit a proposed order consistent with the court's ruling on defendants' third motion for sanctions or show cause why additional time is needed to prepare the proposed order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
U.S.A. DAWGS, INC.,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
Case No. 2:17-CV-2054 JCM (NJK)
ORDER
v.
CROCS, INC., et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
12
13
14
Presently before the court is the matter of U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. v. Crocs, Inc. et al, case no.
2:17-cv-02054-JCM-NJK.
15
On April 15, 2019, the court held a hearing on defendants’ third motion for sanctions. (ECF
16
No. 80). At that hearing, the court granted defendants’ motion and instructed defendants’ counsel
17
to prepare and submit a proposed order consistent with the court’s ruling. Id.
18
As of the date of this order, no proposed judgment has been filed. Accordingly, defendants
19
are hereby ordered to, within seven (7) days from the date of this order, either submit a proposed
20
order or show cause why additional time is needed to prepare the proposed order.
21
...
22
...
23
...
24
...
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS ORDERED THAT defendants shall have seven (7) days from the date of this order
3
to either submit a proposed order consistent with the court’s ruling on defendants’ third motion for
4
sanctions or show cause why additional time is needed to prepare the proposed order. Failure to
5
comply with this order may result in reconsideration of the court’s ruling on the motion.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED May 15, 2019.
8
9
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?