U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. v. Crocs, Inc. et al

Filing 82

ORDER that defendants have seven (7) days from the date of this order to either submit a proposed order consistent with the court's ruling on defendants' third motion for sanctions or show cause why additional time is needed to prepare the proposed order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 U.S.A. DAWGS, INC., 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 10 Case No. 2:17-CV-2054 JCM (NJK) ORDER v. CROCS, INC., et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 14 Presently before the court is the matter of U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. v. Crocs, Inc. et al, case no. 2:17-cv-02054-JCM-NJK. 15 On April 15, 2019, the court held a hearing on defendants’ third motion for sanctions. (ECF 16 No. 80). At that hearing, the court granted defendants’ motion and instructed defendants’ counsel 17 to prepare and submit a proposed order consistent with the court’s ruling. Id. 18 As of the date of this order, no proposed judgment has been filed. Accordingly, defendants 19 are hereby ordered to, within seven (7) days from the date of this order, either submit a proposed 20 order or show cause why additional time is needed to prepare the proposed order. 21 ... 22 ... 23 ... 24 ... 25 ... 26 ... 27 ... 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS ORDERED THAT defendants shall have seven (7) days from the date of this order 3 to either submit a proposed order consistent with the court’s ruling on defendants’ third motion for 4 sanctions or show cause why additional time is needed to prepare the proposed order. Failure to 5 comply with this order may result in reconsideration of the court’s ruling on the motion. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED May 15, 2019. 8 9 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?