Earnest v. Seterus Inc. et al
Filing
10
ORDER Denying without prejudice 9 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. The parties shall file a renewed joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order that complies with the Court's local rules, no later than 10/27/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
CHARLES V. EARNEST,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
SETERUS, INC., et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:17-cv-02065-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 9)
15
16
Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 9. The parties seek
17
a discovery period 185 days beyond the presumptively reasonable discovery period based on (1) their
18
need to assess the required experts and (2) tailor their discovery to new case law that addresses “HOA
19
super-lien issues.” Id. at 2. The parties do not submit why assessing experts or addressing case law
20
from the Federal Courts and the Nevada Supreme Court will affect discovery so as to more than double
21
the presumptive period of time for discovery. Local Rule 26-1(b).
22
Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice the parties’ proposed discovery plan and
23
scheduling order. Docket No. 9. The parties shall file a renewed joint proposed discovery plan and
24
scheduling order that complies with the Court’s local rules, no later than October 27, 2017.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: October 23, 2017
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?