Earnest v. Seterus Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER Denying without prejudice 9 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. The parties shall file a renewed joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order that complies with the Court's local rules, no later than 10/27/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10

CHARLES V. EARNEST,

11

Plaintiff(s),

12

vs.

13

SETERUS, INC., et al.,

14

Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:17-cv-02065-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 9)

15
16

Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 9. The parties seek

17

a discovery period 185 days beyond the presumptively reasonable discovery period based on (1) their

18

need to assess the required experts and (2) tailor their discovery to new case law that addresses “HOA

19

super-lien issues.” Id. at 2. The parties do not submit why assessing experts or addressing case law

20

from the Federal Courts and the Nevada Supreme Court will affect discovery so as to more than double

21

the presumptive period of time for discovery. Local Rule 26-1(b).

22

Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice the parties’ proposed discovery plan and

23

scheduling order. Docket No. 9. The parties shall file a renewed joint proposed discovery plan and

24

scheduling order that complies with the Court’s local rules, no later than October 27, 2017.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

DATED: October 23, 2017

27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge