Lucy v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. et al
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice; Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:17-cv-02067-JCM-CWH Document 27 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
Kevin L. Hernandez, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12594
LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN L.
HERNANDEZ
2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206
Henderson, Nevada 89074
T: (702) 563-4450
F: (702) 552-0408
kevin@kevinhernandezlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
LORI LUCY, an individual;
2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206
Henderson, Nevada 89074
(702) 563-4450 FAX: (702) 552-0408
Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez
10
Case No.: 2:17-cv-02067-JCM-CWH
Plaintiff;
11
v.
12
13
14
15
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., a
foreign corporation; EQUIFAX, INC., a foreign
corporation; EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC., a foreign corporation;
TRANS UNION LLC, a foreign limited-liability
company;
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF ACTION BETWEEN
PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC. WITH PREJUDICE
Defendants.
17
Plaintiff, Lori Lucy (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
18
(“Experian”) (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) have resolved all claims, disputes, and
19
differences between the Parties;
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-cv-02067-JCM-CWH Document 27 Filed 01/03/18 Page 2 of 3
1
Therefore, the Parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, and subject to
2
the court’s approval, respectfully request dismissal of the above-captioned matter with prejudice
3
under FRCP 41(a) as to the action between Plaintiff and Experian, with Plaintiff and Experian
4
bearing their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action.
5
Respectfully Submitted.
6
Dated: January 3, 2018
Dated: January 3, 2018
7
LAW OFFICE OF
KEVIN L. HERNANDEZ
NAYLOR & BRASTER
8
9
2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206
Henderson, Nevada 89074
(702) 563-4450 FAX: (702) 552-0408
Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez
10
11
12
/s/ Kevin L. Hernandez
Kevin L. Hernandez, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12594
2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206
Henderson, Nevada 89074
kevin@kevinhernandezlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
13
14
15
16
/s/ Andrew J. Sharples______
Jennifer L. Braster, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9982
Andrew J. Sharples, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12866
1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
jbraster@nblawnv.com
asharples@nvlawnv.com
Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information
Solutions, Inc.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ACTION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF
AND DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties under FRCP 41(a), the action between Plaintiff
17
and Experian is dismissed with prejudice, and the Parties will bear their own attorneys’ fees and
18
costs incurred in this action.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED:
21
____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
January 4, 2018
DATED: ____________________________
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:17-cv-02067-JCM-CWH Document 27 Filed 01/03/18 Page 3 of 3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
3
DISMISSAL OF ACTION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EXPERIAN
4
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. WITH PREJUDICE was electronically served to the
5
following parties:
Jennifer L. Braster, Esq.
Andrew J. Sharples, Esq.
NAYLOR & BRASTER
1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
jbraster@nblawnv.com
asharples@nblawnv.com
Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information
Solutions, Inc.
6
7
8
9
2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206
Henderson, Nevada 89074
(702) 563-4450 FAX: (702) 552-0408
Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez
10
11
12
Dated: January 3, 2018
/s/ Caesy Morales
.
An Employee of the Law Office of Kevin L.
Hernandez
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?