Lucy v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER granting 27 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice; Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02067-JCM-CWH Document 27 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kevin L. Hernandez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12594 LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN L. HERNANDEZ 2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206 Henderson, Nevada 89074 T: (702) 563-4450 F: (702) 552-0408 kevin@kevinhernandezlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 LORI LUCY, an individual; 2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206 Henderson, Nevada 89074 (702) 563-4450 FAX: (702) 552-0408 Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez 10 Case No.: 2:17-cv-02067-JCM-CWH Plaintiff; 11 v. 12 13 14 15 SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., a foreign corporation; EQUIFAX, INC., a foreign corporation; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., a foreign corporation; TRANS UNION LLC, a foreign limited-liability company; 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, Lori Lucy (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 18 (“Experian”) (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) have resolved all claims, disputes, and 19 differences between the Parties; 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Page 1 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-02067-JCM-CWH Document 27 Filed 01/03/18 Page 2 of 3 1 Therefore, the Parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, and subject to 2 the court’s approval, respectfully request dismissal of the above-captioned matter with prejudice 3 under FRCP 41(a) as to the action between Plaintiff and Experian, with Plaintiff and Experian 4 bearing their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action. 5 Respectfully Submitted. 6 Dated: January 3, 2018 Dated: January 3, 2018 7 LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN L. HERNANDEZ NAYLOR & BRASTER 8 9 2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206 Henderson, Nevada 89074 (702) 563-4450 FAX: (702) 552-0408 Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez 10 11 12 /s/ Kevin L. Hernandez Kevin L. Hernandez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12594 2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206 Henderson, Nevada 89074 kevin@kevinhernandezlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff 13 14 15 16 /s/ Andrew J. Sharples______ Jennifer L. Braster, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9982 Andrew J. Sharples, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12866 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 jbraster@nblawnv.com asharples@nvlawnv.com Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO ACTION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties under FRCP 41(a), the action between Plaintiff 17 and Experian is dismissed with prejudice, and the Parties will bear their own attorneys’ fees and 18 costs incurred in this action. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED: 21 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 January 4, 2018 DATED: ____________________________ 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-02067-JCM-CWH Document 27 Filed 01/03/18 Page 3 of 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 The undersigned certifies that the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 3 DISMISSAL OF ACTION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EXPERIAN 4 INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. WITH PREJUDICE was electronically served to the 5 following parties: Jennifer L. Braster, Esq. Andrew J. Sharples, Esq. NAYLOR & BRASTER 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 jbraster@nblawnv.com asharples@nblawnv.com Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 6 7 8 9 2510 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 206 Henderson, Nevada 89074 (702) 563-4450 FAX: (702) 552-0408 Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez 10 11 12 Dated: January 3, 2018 /s/ Caesy Morales . An Employee of the Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?