Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Advance Polybag (Nevada), Inc.
Filing
44
ORDER granting 43 Stipulation to Schedule Deposition of Jeff Ford; Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:17-cv-02077-RFB-NJK Document 43 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
JAMES A. KOHL
Nevada Bar No. 5692
W. WEST ALLEN
Nevada Bar. No. 5566
wwa@h2law.com
HOWARD & HOWARD PLLC
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1000
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: (702) 667-4843
Facsimile: (702) 567-1568
Attorneys for Defendant
Advance Polybag (Nevada), Inc.
9
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY;
14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
ADVANCE POLYBAG (NEVADA), INC.,
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO SCHEDULE DEPOSITION
OF JEFF FORD ON MAY 31, 2018
(First Request for Ford Deposition)
Defendant.
17
Case No. 2:17-cv-02077-RFB-NJK
18
19
Pursuant to LR 26-1 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), the parties, Union Pacific Railroad
20
Company (“Union Pacific”) and Advance Polybag (Nevada), Inc. (“Advance Polybag”),
21
respectfully submit the following Stipulation and proposed Order and jointly request that the
22
Court approve the taking of the deposition of Jeff Ford on May 31, 2018.
23
24
Whereas, third party witness Jeff Ford (“Ford”) has extensive knowledge about the
lease and the railroad tracks that are at issue in this matter;
25
26
27
28
Whereas, Mr. Ford has been subpoenaed to appear for his deposition on May 25,
2018;
Whereas, Mr. Ford’s attorney reached out to counsel for Advance Polybag to get an
alternate date for Ford’s deposition;
1
STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING ORDER
Case 2:17-cv-02077-RFB-NJK Document 43 Filed 05/22/18 Page 2 of 3
Whereas, Counsel for Ford informed counsel for Advance Polybag that Mr. Ford has
1
2
prearranged travel plans from May 25 through May 29, 2018;
Whereas, counsel for Advance Polybag and Union Pacific would like to
3
4
accommodate Mr. Ford by moving his deposition to May 31, 2018;
Whereas, the current discovery cutoff is May 29, 2018;
5
7
Now therefore the Parties stipulate and agree that they are willing to take Mr.Ford’s
2018
deposition on May 31, 2019, if the Court approves this stipulation. This stipulation is limited
8
solely to Mr. Ford’s deposition. Advance Polybag and Union Pacific respectfully request
9
that the Court approve this stipulation and issue an Order permitting Mr. Ford’s deposition to
6
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC
10
take place on May 31, 2018.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
LAMSON, DUGAN & MURRAY, LLP and
PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER
HOWARD & HOWARD, PLLC
By:
/s/ James A. Kohl
James A. Kohl
W. West Allen
HOWARD & HOWARD, PLLC
300 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1000
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: (702) 667-4843
Facsimile: (702) 567-1568
/s/Kyle Wallor
By:
Kyle Wallor, Nebraska Bar No. 21346
Admitted Pro Hac Vice, July 27, 2017
Nelly F. Greenberg, Nebraska Bar No. 26036
Admitted Pro Hac Vice, April 16, 2018
LAMSON, DUGAN & MURRAY, LLP
10306 Regency Parkway Drive
Omaha, NE 68114
kwallor@ldmlaw.com
ngreenberg@lmdlaw.com
(402) 397-7300
ATTORNEY FOR
DEFENDANT
and
Michael R. Kealy, Esq., NV Bar No. 971
Ashley Christine Nikkel, Nevada Bar No. 12838
PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER
50 W. Liberty Street, Suite 750
Reno, Nevada 89501
Telephone: (775) 323-1601
mkealyPparsonsbehle.com
anikkel@parsonsbehle.com
27
28
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
2
STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING ORDER
Case 2:17-cv-02077-RFB-NJK Document 43 Filed 05/22/18 Page 3 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL
BE GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
___________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
May 22, 2018
DATED: _________________
6
7
8
9
HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?