Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Advance Polybag (Nevada), Inc.

Filing 44

ORDER granting 43 Stipulation to Schedule Deposition of Jeff Ford; Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02077-RFB-NJK Document 43 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JAMES A. KOHL Nevada Bar No. 5692 W. WEST ALLEN Nevada Bar. No. 5566 wwa@h2law.com HOWARD & HOWARD PLLC 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 667-4843 Facsimile: (702) 567-1568 Attorneys for Defendant Advance Polybag (Nevada), Inc. 9 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 ADVANCE POLYBAG (NEVADA), INC., STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SCHEDULE DEPOSITION OF JEFF FORD ON MAY 31, 2018 (First Request for Ford Deposition) Defendant. 17 Case No. 2:17-cv-02077-RFB-NJK 18 19 Pursuant to LR 26-1 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), the parties, Union Pacific Railroad 20 Company (“Union Pacific”) and Advance Polybag (Nevada), Inc. (“Advance Polybag”), 21 respectfully submit the following Stipulation and proposed Order and jointly request that the 22 Court approve the taking of the deposition of Jeff Ford on May 31, 2018. 23 24 Whereas, third party witness Jeff Ford (“Ford”) has extensive knowledge about the lease and the railroad tracks that are at issue in this matter; 25 26 27 28 Whereas, Mr. Ford has been subpoenaed to appear for his deposition on May 25, 2018; Whereas, Mr. Ford’s attorney reached out to counsel for Advance Polybag to get an alternate date for Ford’s deposition; 1 STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING ORDER Case 2:17-cv-02077-RFB-NJK Document 43 Filed 05/22/18 Page 2 of 3 Whereas, Counsel for Ford informed counsel for Advance Polybag that Mr. Ford has 1 2 prearranged travel plans from May 25 through May 29, 2018; Whereas, counsel for Advance Polybag and Union Pacific would like to 3 4 accommodate Mr. Ford by moving his deposition to May 31, 2018; Whereas, the current discovery cutoff is May 29, 2018; 5 7 Now therefore the Parties stipulate and agree that they are willing to take Mr.Ford’s 2018 deposition on May 31, 2019, if the Court approves this stipulation. This stipulation is limited 8 solely to Mr. Ford’s deposition. Advance Polybag and Union Pacific respectfully request 9 that the Court approve this stipulation and issue an Order permitting Mr. Ford’s deposition to 6 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC 10 take place on May 31, 2018. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 LAMSON, DUGAN & MURRAY, LLP and PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER HOWARD & HOWARD, PLLC By: /s/ James A. Kohl James A. Kohl W. West Allen HOWARD & HOWARD, PLLC 300 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1000 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 667-4843 Facsimile: (702) 567-1568 /s/Kyle Wallor By: Kyle Wallor, Nebraska Bar No. 21346 Admitted Pro Hac Vice, July 27, 2017 Nelly F. Greenberg, Nebraska Bar No. 26036 Admitted Pro Hac Vice, April 16, 2018 LAMSON, DUGAN & MURRAY, LLP 10306 Regency Parkway Drive Omaha, NE 68114 kwallor@ldmlaw.com ngreenberg@lmdlaw.com (402) 397-7300 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT and Michael R. Kealy, Esq., NV Bar No. 971 Ashley Christine Nikkel, Nevada Bar No. 12838 PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER 50 W. Liberty Street, Suite 750 Reno, Nevada 89501 Telephone: (775) 323-1601 mkealyPparsonsbehle.com anikkel@parsonsbehle.com 27 28 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 2 STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING ORDER Case 2:17-cv-02077-RFB-NJK Document 43 Filed 05/22/18 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED: ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE May 22, 2018 DATED: _________________ 6 7 8 9 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?