Wolf et al v. Clark County Department of Family Services et al

Filing 62

ORDER re 60 , 61 Proofs of Service re Subpoenas Duces Tecum. The Court STRIKES Docket Nos. 60-61 and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/15/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 BRUCE WOLF, et al., 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 On February 15, 2018, Plaintiffs filed proofs of service regarding subpoenas duces tecum. 17 Docket Nos. 60-61. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. 18 See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered by the Court 19 in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Docket Nos. 60-61 and instructs the parties to refrain 20 from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so. 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 v. 13 CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES, 14 Defendant(s). 21 ORDER (Docket Nos. 60-61) IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Case No. 2:17-cv-02084-JCM-NJK Dated: February 15, 2018 23 24 25 26 27 28 NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?