Ayala v. Gentry et al

Filing 4

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 1 petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED. IT IS ORDERED that 2 petitioner's Ex Parte Request for Appointment of Counsel is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District o f Nevada (FPD) is appointed to represent petitioner. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the FPD shall have 30 days from the date of entry of this order to file a notice of appearance, or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent the petitioner in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 30 days from the date on which the petition is served upon them to appear in this action. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: FPD, Adam Laxalt - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 OMAR AYALA, 9 Petitioner, 10 vs. 11 JO GENTRY, et al., 12 2:17-cv-02093-RFB-VCF Respondents. ORDER 13 _______________________________/ 14 15 This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, by 16 Omar Ayala, a Nevada prisoner. On July 31, 2017, Ayala filed an application to proceed in forma 17 pauperis (ECF No. 1), along with his habeas corpus petition (attached to application to proceed in 18 forma pauperis, at ECF No. 1-1) and a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2). 19 In light of the information provided in the application to proceed in forma pauperis, the 20 Court finds that Ayala is able to pay the $5 filing fee for this action. The Court will deny the 21 application to proceed in forma pauperis, but will not require Ayala to pay the filing fee until after 22 counsel appears for him. 23 The information provided in the application to proceed in forma pauperis also indicates that 24 Ayala cannot afford counsel. “Indigent state prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are not 25 entitled to appointed counsel unless the circumstances of a particular case indicate that appointed 26 counsel is necessary to prevent due process violations.” Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th 1 Cir. 1986) (citing Kreiling v. Field, 431 F.2d 638, 640 (9th Cir. 1970) (per curiam). The court may, 2 however, appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings “if the interests of justice so require.” See 3 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196. 4 In light of Ayala’s youth, the severity of the crimes involved in this case, Ayala’s sentence, and the 5 number and nature of the issues raised in state court regarding Ayala’s case, the Court finds that 6 appointment of counsel is in the interests of justice. 7 The Court has reviewed Ayala’s petition, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 8 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and determines that it merits service upon 9 respondents and a response by respondents. The court will order the petition in this case served upon 10 respondents, will direct respondents to appear, but will not require any further action on the part of 11 respondents at this time. 12 13 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s Ex Parte Request for Appointment of 15 Counsel (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) 16 is appointed to represent petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent the petitioner, due to a conflict 17 of interest or other reason, then alternate counsel will be appointed. In either case, counsel will 18 represent the petitioner in all federal-court proceedings relating to this matter, unless allowed to 19 withdraw. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall electronically serve upon the 21 FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus 22 (ECF No. 1-1). 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the FPD shall have 30 days from the date of entry of this 24 order to file a notice of appearance, or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent the petitioner 25 in this case. 26 2 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for petitioner to pay the filing fee for this action, 2 or file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis is extended. The court will set a new deadline 3 for payment of the filing fee after counsel appear for the petitioner and the respondents. 4 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall electronically serve upon 7 respondents a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1-1), and a copy of this order. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 30 days from the date on which 9 10 11 12 the petition is served upon them to appear in this action. Respondents will not be required to respond to the habeas petition at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court will establish a schedule for further proceedings after counsel appear for the petitioner and the respondents. 13 14 DATED this 7th day of August, 2017. 15 16 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?