Wilcock v. Gentry et al
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 79 Motion to Extend Time re 70 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 2/21/2023. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/23/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
Case 2:17-cv-02101-JAD-VCF Document 80 Filed 01/23/23 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 PATRICK EDWARD WILCOCK,
6 JO GENTRY, et al.,
Case No.: 2:17-cv-02101-JAD-VCF
Order Granting Extension of Time to
Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss to
February 21, 2023
[ECF No. 79]
Respondents ask the court for a 60-day extension of time to file a reply in support of their
11 motion to dismiss Patrick Edward Wilcock’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. 1 While I
12 find good cause to grant an extension, I do not find that such a long extension is warranted. I am
13 also highly unlikely to grant any further extension absent extraordinary circumstances.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ unopposed motion for extension of
15 time to reply in support of the motion to dismiss [ECF No. 79] is GRANTED in part. The
16 deadline to oppose is extended to February 21, 2023.
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
Dated: January 23, 2023
ECF No. 79.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?