Miller v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
Filing
132
ORDER Granting 131 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 109 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 5/11/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/26/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-02103-JCM-DJA Document 131 Filed 03/25/20 Page 1 of 3
1 JOSH COLE AICKLEN
Nevada Bar No. 7254
2 E-Mail: Josh.Aicklen@lewisbrisbois.com
JAMES E. MURPHY
3 Nevada Bar No. 8586
E-Mail: James.Murphy@lewisbrisbois.com
4 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
6385 South Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
5 Las Vegas, NV 89118
Telephone: 702.693.4374
6 Facsimile: 702.893.3789
Attorneys for Defendants,
7 GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and
BRANDON WILLIAMS
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11 MELVA N. MILLER, an individual,
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14 GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; MOTOR COACH
15 INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; BRANDON WILLIAMS;
16 DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS IX, inclusive,
17
Defendant.
18
19
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-02103-JCM-CWH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO REPLY TO
PLAINTIFF’S LIMITED OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff MELVA
20 MILLER (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and BRANDON
21 WILLIAMS (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record Robert
22 Cottle, Esq. and Matthew Holland, Esq. of THE COTTLE FIRM, and James E. Murphy,
23 Esq. and Stephanie A. Garabedian, Esq. of the law firm LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD &
24 SMITH LLP, as follows:
25
Due to the closing of the law firms in light of the COVID-19 virus by order of the
26 Governor of Nevada, the deadline for Defendants to file their Reply to Plaintiff’s Limited
27 Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is extended from March 27,
LEWIS
28 2020 to May 11, 2020.
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4835-1571-0392.1
Case 2:17-cv-02103-JCM-DJA Document 131 Filed 03/25/20 Page 2 of 3
1 DATED this 25th day of March, 2020.
DATED this 25th day of March, 2020.
2 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP THE COTTLE FIRM
3 By /s/ James E. Murphy, Esq.
James E. Murphy, Esq.
4
Stephanie A. Garabedian, Esq.
5
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
6
Attorneys for Defendant
By /s/ Robert Cottle, Esq.
Robert Cottle, Esq.
Matthew Holland, Esq.
8635 South Eastern Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
8
9
[PROPOSED] ORDER
10
Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore:
11
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants’ Reply
12
to Plaintiff’s Limited Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment shall be
13
filed on or before May 11, 2020.
14
DATED March 26, 2020. _________________ 2020.
this _____ day of
15
16
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4835-1571-0392.1
2
Case 2:17-cv-02103-JCM-DJA Document 131 Filed 03/25/20 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
Pursuant to FRCP 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of, and that on this 25th day
3 of March, 2020, I did cause a true copy of STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
4 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S LIMITED
5 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT to be served
6 via electronic service by the U.S. District Court CM/ECF system to the parties on the
7 Electronic Filing System.
8
9 ROBERT W. COTTLE, ESQ.
MATTHEW G. HOLLAND, ESQ.
10 THE COTTLE FIRM
8635 South Eastern Avenue
11 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
rcottle@cottlefirm.com
12 mholland@cottlefirm.com
Telephone: (702)722-6111
13 Facsimile: (702) 834-8555
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
15
16
By /s/ Mary Bradley-Estrada
an Employee of LEWIS BRISBOIS
BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4846-5953-7045.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?