Miller v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al

Filing 132

ORDER Granting 131 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 109 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 5/11/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/26/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02103-JCM-DJA Document 131 Filed 03/25/20 Page 1 of 3 1 JOSH COLE AICKLEN Nevada Bar No. 7254 2 E-Mail: Josh.Aicklen@lewisbrisbois.com JAMES E. MURPHY 3 Nevada Bar No. 8586 E-Mail: James.Murphy@lewisbrisbois.com 4 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 6385 South Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600 5 Las Vegas, NV 89118 Telephone: 702.693.4374 6 Facsimile: 702.893.3789 Attorneys for Defendants, 7 GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and BRANDON WILLIAMS 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 MELVA N. MILLER, an individual, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; MOTOR COACH 15 INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; BRANDON WILLIAMS; 16 DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS IX, inclusive, 17 Defendant. 18 19 CASE NO. 2:17-CV-02103-JCM-CWH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S LIMITED OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff MELVA 20 MILLER (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and BRANDON 21 WILLIAMS (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record Robert 22 Cottle, Esq. and Matthew Holland, Esq. of THE COTTLE FIRM, and James E. Murphy, 23 Esq. and Stephanie A. Garabedian, Esq. of the law firm LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & 24 SMITH LLP, as follows: 25 Due to the closing of the law firms in light of the COVID-19 virus by order of the 26 Governor of Nevada, the deadline for Defendants to file their Reply to Plaintiff’s Limited 27 Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is extended from March 27, LEWIS 28 2020 to May 11, 2020. BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4835-1571-0392.1 Case 2:17-cv-02103-JCM-DJA Document 131 Filed 03/25/20 Page 2 of 3 1 DATED this 25th day of March, 2020. DATED this 25th day of March, 2020. 2 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP THE COTTLE FIRM 3 By /s/ James E. Murphy, Esq. James E. Murphy, Esq. 4 Stephanie A. Garabedian, Esq. 5 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 6 Attorneys for Defendant By /s/ Robert Cottle, Esq. Robert Cottle, Esq. Matthew Holland, Esq. 8635 South Eastern Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 9 [PROPOSED] ORDER 10 Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore: 11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants’ Reply 12 to Plaintiff’s Limited Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment shall be 13 filed on or before May 11, 2020. 14 DATED March 26, 2020. _________________ 2020. this _____ day of 15 16 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4835-1571-0392.1 2 Case 2:17-cv-02103-JCM-DJA Document 131 Filed 03/25/20 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 Pursuant to FRCP 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of, and that on this 25th day 3 of March, 2020, I did cause a true copy of STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S LIMITED 5 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT to be served 6 via electronic service by the U.S. District Court CM/ECF system to the parties on the 7 Electronic Filing System. 8 9 ROBERT W. COTTLE, ESQ. MATTHEW G. HOLLAND, ESQ. 10 THE COTTLE FIRM 8635 South Eastern Avenue 11 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 rcottle@cottlefirm.com 12 mholland@cottlefirm.com Telephone: (702)722-6111 13 Facsimile: (702) 834-8555 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff 15 16 By /s/ Mary Bradley-Estrada an Employee of LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4846-5953-7045.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?