Miller v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the court denies 17 the proposed discovery plan without prejudice for the parties to meet and confer and file a revised proposed discovery plan and scheduling order by 9/25/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/11/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
MELVA N. MILLER,
MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES, INC., et al.,
Case No. 2:17-cv-02103-JCM-CWH
Presently before the court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan and scheduling order (ECF
No. 17), filed on September 1, 2017.
The parties request one year for discovery rather than the standard 180-day discovery plan,
but the parties do not explain why longer deadlines should apply in this case. See LR 26-1(a)
(stating that “[p]lans requesting special scheduling review must include, in addition to the
information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and LR 26-1(b), a statement of the reasons why longer
or different time periods should apply to the case”). The court therefore is unable to evaluate
whether special scheduling review is appropriate in this case. Additionally, the proposed discovery
plan does not comply with Local Rule 26-1(b)(7)-(9). The court therefore denies the proposed
discovery plan without prejudice for the parties to meet and confer and file a revised proposed
discovery plan and scheduling order by September 25, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 11, 2017
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?