Douglas v. Dreamdealers USA, LLC et al
Filing
49
ORDER Granting 48 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 1/24/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 11/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:17-cv-02134-APG-BNW Document 48 Filed 11/20/19 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
WENDY M. KRINCEK, ESQ., Bar # 6417
MARCUS B. SMITH, ESQ., Bar # 12098
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
Telephone:
702.862.8800
Fax No.:
702.862.8811
Email:
wkrincek@littler.com
mbsmith@littler.com
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendants
Dreamdealers USA, LLC d/b/a Exotics Racing,
David Perisset, and Roman Thievin
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
EDWARD B. DOUGLAS, an individual,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. 2:17-cv-02134-APG-BNW
vs.
DREAMDEALERS USA, LLC d/b/a
EXOTICS RACING, A Nevada limited
liability company, DAVID PERISSET, an
individual, and ROMAN THIEVIN, an
individual,
PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO EXTEND JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER
DEADLINE
(SECOND REQUEST)
Defendant.
18
19
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, 7-1, and 26-4, Defendants, DREAMDEALERS
20
USA, LLC d/b/a EXOTICS RACING, DAVID PERISSET, and ROMAN THIEVIN, and Plaintiff,
21
EDWARD B. DOUGLAS, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate for
22
an extension of time to file the Joint Pretrial Order of November 25, 2019 to January 24, 2020. This
23
is the second request for an extension to file the Joint Pretrial Order. The requested extension is
24
sought in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 H oward Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800
Case 2:17-cv-02134-APG-BNW Document 48 Filed 11/20/19 Page 2 of 2
1
Good cause and excusable neglect exist because, in preparation for the Joint Pretrial Order, the
2
parties have engaged in meet and confer efforts and supplemental discovery responses have been
3
made, including Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental Responses to Defendant’s Interrogatories,
4
Plaintiff’s Third Supplemental Responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production of Documents,
5
6
and Plaintiff’s Fourth Supplemental Responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production of
7
Documents, all of which are relevant to the joint pretrial order. Moreover, the parties have agreed to
8
engage in further settlement negotiations, including the possibility of a formal mediation, and wish
9
to avoid the additional expense of preparing the Joint Pretrial Order in order to conserve resources
10
for potential settlement.
11
12
Dated: November 20, 2019
Dated: November 20, 2019
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
17
/s/ Dustin L. Clark, Esq.
DUSTIN L. CLARK, ESQ.
HOLLEY DRIGGS WALCH
FINE PUZEY STEIN & THOMPSON
/s/ Marcus B. Smith, Esq.
WENDY M. KRINCEK, ESQ.
MARCUS B. SMITH, ESQ.
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
18
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendants
13
14
15
16
19
20
ORDER
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated: November 21
_____________________, 2019.
23
24
25
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
4819-3639-7736.1 087825.1002
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 H oward Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800
2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?