Douglas v. Dreamdealers USA, LLC et al

Filing 49

ORDER Granting 48 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 1/24/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 11/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02134-APG-BNW Document 48 Filed 11/20/19 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 WENDY M. KRINCEK, ESQ., Bar # 6417 MARCUS B. SMITH, ESQ., Bar # 12098 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 Telephone: 702.862.8800 Fax No.: 702.862.8811 Email: wkrincek@littler.com mbsmith@littler.com 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants Dreamdealers USA, LLC d/b/a Exotics Racing, David Perisset, and Roman Thievin UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 EDWARD B. DOUGLAS, an individual, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 2:17-cv-02134-APG-BNW vs. DREAMDEALERS USA, LLC d/b/a EXOTICS RACING, A Nevada limited liability company, DAVID PERISSET, an individual, and ROMAN THIEVIN, an individual, PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER DEADLINE (SECOND REQUEST) Defendant. 18 19 Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, 7-1, and 26-4, Defendants, DREAMDEALERS 20 USA, LLC d/b/a EXOTICS RACING, DAVID PERISSET, and ROMAN THIEVIN, and Plaintiff, 21 EDWARD B. DOUGLAS, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate for 22 an extension of time to file the Joint Pretrial Order of November 25, 2019 to January 24, 2020. This 23 is the second request for an extension to file the Joint Pretrial Order. The requested extension is 24 sought in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3960 H oward Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 702.862.8800 Case 2:17-cv-02134-APG-BNW Document 48 Filed 11/20/19 Page 2 of 2 1 Good cause and excusable neglect exist because, in preparation for the Joint Pretrial Order, the 2 parties have engaged in meet and confer efforts and supplemental discovery responses have been 3 made, including Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental Responses to Defendant’s Interrogatories, 4 Plaintiff’s Third Supplemental Responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production of Documents, 5 6 and Plaintiff’s Fourth Supplemental Responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production of 7 Documents, all of which are relevant to the joint pretrial order. Moreover, the parties have agreed to 8 engage in further settlement negotiations, including the possibility of a formal mediation, and wish 9 to avoid the additional expense of preparing the Joint Pretrial Order in order to conserve resources 10 for potential settlement. 11 12 Dated: November 20, 2019 Dated: November 20, 2019 Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, 17 /s/ Dustin L. Clark, Esq. DUSTIN L. CLARK, ESQ. HOLLEY DRIGGS WALCH FINE PUZEY STEIN & THOMPSON /s/ Marcus B. Smith, Esq. WENDY M. KRINCEK, ESQ. MARCUS B. SMITH, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 18 Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants 13 14 15 16 19 20 ORDER 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: November 21 _____________________, 2019. 23 24 25 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 4819-3639-7736.1 087825.1002 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3960 H oward Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 702.862.8800 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?