Cooper v. Credit One Bank, N.A.

Filing 38

ORDER Denying 35 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. If Defendant intends to file a motion to stay discovery, it must do so no later than 12/1/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
BOBBIE COOPER, et al.,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.,
14
Defendant(s).
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:17-cv-02153-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 35)

16

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket

17

No. 35. Plaintiffs submit that Defendant will not join the discovery plan because it intends to file a

18

motion to stay discovery. Id. Local Rule 26-1(a) requires the parties to submit a stipulated discovery

19

plan and scheduling order. Therefore, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ proposed discovery plan and

20

scheduling order. Docket No. 35. If Defendant intends to file a motion to stay discovery, it must do so

21

no later than December 1, 2017.1

22

//

23

//

24

//

25

//

26
27
28

1

The Court expresses no opinion herein regarding the merits of any potential motion to stay
discovery.

1

If no motion to stay discovery is filed by that date, the parties shall file a joint proposed discovery plan

2

no later than December 4, 2017.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

DATED: November 28, 2017

5
6

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2