Gold v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 21 the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 18 Debra C. Gold's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 19 the Commissioner's Cross-Motion to Affirm is GRANTED.The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

C. DEBRA GOLD,

10

Plaintiff,
ORDER

11
12
13

v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.

14

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 21] of the

15
16

Case No. 2:17-cv-02155-RFB-VCF

Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered January 7, 2019.

17

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

18

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific

19

written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

20

§ 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is

21

required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed

22

findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local

23

Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct

24

“any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

25

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due

26

by January 21, 2019. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this

27

case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.

28

...

28 U.S.C.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 21] is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Debra C. Gold’s Motion for Reversal and/or Remand
(ECF No. 18) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF
No. 19) is GRANTED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

8
9

DATED: February 11, 2019.
_____________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-