Rankin v. McDaniel et al

Filing 4

ORDER that Plaintiff shall file his updated address with the Court no later than July 16, 2018. FURTHER ORDERED that 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court SHALL SEND Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application. FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than July 16, 2 018, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either: file a complete ifp application for non-prisoners or pay the full filing fee. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but shall not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 CHARLES ALLEN RANKIN, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 Case No. 2:17-cv-02156-RFB-NJK ORDER v. ELDON K. MCDANIEL, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. DISCUSSION 16 According to the Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”) inmate database, 17 Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated at High Desert State Prison and has been released from 18 the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections. Plaintiff has not filed an updated 19 address notification with the Court. A pro se party “must immediately file with the court 20 written notification of any change of mailing address, email address, telephone number, 21 or facsimile number. The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party 22 or the party’s attorney.” LR IA 3-1. “Failure to comply with this rule may result in the 23 dismissal of the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed 24 appropriate by the court.” Id. No later than July 16, 2018, Plaintiff must file his updated 25 address with this Court. If Plaintiff does not update the Court with his current address on 26 or before July 16, 2018, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. 27 In addition, Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis for 28 prisoners. (ECF No. 1, 3). The Court now ORDERS Plaintiff to either file an application 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner or pay the full filing fee of $400, no later than July 16, 2018. The Court will retain Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but will not file it until the matter of the payment of the filing fee is resolved. II. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that Plaintiff shall file his updated address with the Court no later than July 16, 2018. If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, the Court may dismiss this case without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners (ECF No. 1) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court SHALL SEND Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than July 16, 2018, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either: (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis for non-prisoners; or (2) pay the full filing fee of $400. If Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, the Court may dismiss this case without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint (ECF No. 1-1), but shall not file it at this time. 20 21 DATED THIS 14th day of June, 2018. 22 23 24 NANCY J. KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?