Stath v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al

Filing 15

ORDER Granting 14 Stipulation to Extend Time. Experian Information Solutions, Inc answer due 9/26/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:17-cv-02163-RFB-CWH Document 14 Filed 09/18/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Jennifer L. Braster
Nevada Bar No. 9982
Andrew J. Sharples
Nevada Bar No. 12866
NAYLOR & BRASTER
1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89145
(T) [phone]
(F) [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10
11

MICHAEL J. STATH,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

Case No. 2:17-cv-02163-RFB-CWH

v.
WELLS FARGO, N.A.; EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC;
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.; and TRANS UNION LLC,

16

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
(SECOND REQUEST)

Defendants.

17
18

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Michael J. Stath (“Plaintiff”), and

19

Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), by and through its attorneys of

20

record, as follows:

21

Plaintiff filed his Complaint on August 14, 2016. The deadline for Experian to respond to

22

the Complaint is currently September 19, 2017. Counsel for Experian was retained shortly before

23

the parties filed the first request to extend the response deadline. Plaintiff and Experian stipulate

24

and agree that Experian shall have until September 26, 2017, to file its responsive pleading. This

25

is the parties’ second request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint and is not

26

intended

27
28
NAYLOR & BRASTER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89145
[phone]

to

cause

any

delay

or

prejudice

to

any

party,

but

rather

to

Case 2:17-cv-02163-RFB-CWH Document 14 Filed 09/18/17 Page 2 of 2

1

accommodate counsel for Experian who is in the process of reviewing the allegations in the

2

Complaint.

3

Dated: September 18, 2017

4

PAYNE LAW FIRM LLC

NAYLOR & BRASTER

By: /s/ Sean N. Payne
Sean N. Payne
Nevada Bar No. 13216
9550 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 253-A213
Las Vegas, NV 89123

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Braster
Jennifer L. Braster
Nevada Bar No. 9982
1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89145

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Miles N. Clark
Nevada Bar No. 13848
Matthew I. Knepper
Nevada Bar No. 12796
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave. Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
David H. Krieger
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Attorneys for Plaintiff

17
18
19
20
21

Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information
Solutions, Inc.

ORDER
IT IS ORDERED THAT Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s time to respond to
Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended to on or September 26, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
MAGISTRATE

24

DATED this _____day of 2017
September 20, _________ 2017.

25
26
27
28
NAYLOR & BRASTER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89145
[phone]

2 of 2