Ditech Financal LLC et al v. American West Village II Owners Association et al

Filing 29

ORDER Granting 27 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 19 MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint. Plaintiffs' Responses due by 11/17/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Case 2:17-cv-02164-JCM-GWF Document 27 Filed 10/31/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6

LINDSEY H. MORALES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11519
BUCKLEY MADOLE, P.C.
1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 130
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Tel: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC and
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC; FEDERAL
NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a
government-sponsored entity,

12
13
14
15
16
17

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-2164-JCM (GWF)
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (FIRST
REQUEST)

Plaintiffs,
v.
AMERICAN WEST VILLAGE II OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation; SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES
8829 CORNWALL GLEN, a Nevada
corporation; NEVADA ASSOCIATION
SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation; DOE
INDIVIDUALS I-X, inclusive; and ROE
CORPORATIONS XI – XX, inclusive,

18
Defendants.
19
20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Lindsey H. Morales, Esq., attorney for

21

Plaintiffs Ditech Financial LLC (hereafter “Ditech”) and Federal National Mortgage Association

22

(hereafter “FNMA”) and Michael F. Bohn, Esq., attorney for Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series

23
8829 Cornwall Glen (hereafter “Saticoy Bay”) that Plaintiffs may have additional time within
24
25

which to oppose or otherwise respond to Saticoy Bay’s Motion to Dismiss filed on October 19,

26

2017 as docket number 19. Specifically, the parties have agreed to extend Defendant’s time to

27

respond by 14 days from the original due date of November 2, 2017; therefore, Plaintiffs may

28

oppose or otherwise respond to the Motion to Dismiss on or before November 17, 2017.
-1-

Case 2:17-cv-02164-JCM-GWF Document 27 Filed 10/31/17 Page 2 of 2

1
2
3

The parties further agree that good cause exists for this extension; the amended response
deadline provides Plaintiffs with the opportunity to thoroughly respond to the motion without
significantly delaying the prosecution of this case in whole.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

26th
Signed this _____ day of October, 2017

26th
Signed this _____ day of October, 2017

/s/ Lindsey H. Morales
By:_____________________________
Lindsey H. Morales, Esq.
Buckley Madole, PC
1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 130
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Attorney for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

/s/ Michael F. Bohn
By:_______________________________
Michael F. Bohn, Esq.
Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Esq., Ltd.
376 E. Warm Springs Road, Suite 140
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Attorney for Saticoy Bay LLC

11
12
13
ORDER

14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff shall answer or otherwise respond to Defendant’s Motion to
November 17
Dismiss Compliant on or before ______________, 2017.

17
18

November
7th
17
Dated this ____ day of ________________, 20____.

19

__________________________________
DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES JUDGE

20
21

Submitted by:

22

_____________________________
Lindsey H. Morales, Esq.
Buckley Madole, PC
1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 130
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
[e-mail]

23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-