New Penn Financial, LLC v. Riverwalk Ranch Master Homeowners Association et al
Filing
107
FINAL ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS SO ORDERED that Cross-claimant Fojas' claims against cross-defendant Riverwalk are dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing their respective attorney's fees and costs; this Order disposes of all remaining claims in this case; and this case is dismissed pursuant to the terms of this Order and prior Orders of this Court and the Clerk shall enter a final judgment of dismissal.Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/29/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
Case 2:17-cv-02167-APG-VCF Document 106 Filed 09/22/21 Page 7 of 7
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, et al.,
Plaintiff,
4
5
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL
vs.
6
Case No.: 2:17-CV-02167-APG-VCF
RIVERWALK RANCH MASTER
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al.
7
Defendants.
8
9
Honorable Andrew Gordon District Court Judge
10
The Court orders as follows:
11
IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
12
13
Ricardo Fojas filed a crossclaim against Riverwalk Ranch Master
Homeowners Association [ECF No. 18].
2.
14
As set forth in this Court’s order from August 16, 2021, cross-claimant
15
Fojas accepted an offer of judgment from cross-defendant Riverwalk. ECF No.
16
105.
17
3.
Fojas has received payment from Riverwalk.
18
4.
Cross-claimant Fojas’ claims against cross-defendant Riverwalk are
19
dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing their respective attorney’s fees
20
and costs.
21
5.
This Order disposes of all remaining claims in this case.
22
6.
This case is dismissed is pursuant to the terms of this Order and prior
23
24
25
26
Orders of this Court and the Clerk shall enter a final judgment of dismissal
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Case No. 2:17-CV-02167-APG-VCF
27
28
September 29, 2021
DATED:____________________________________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?