New Penn Financial, LLC v. Riverwalk Ranch Master Homeowners Association et al

Filing 107

FINAL ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS SO ORDERED that Cross-claimant Fojas' claims against cross-defendant Riverwalk are dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing their respective attorney's fees and costs; this Order disposes of all remaining claims in this case; and this case is dismissed pursuant to the terms of this Order and prior Orders of this Court and the Clerk shall enter a final judgment of dismissal.Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/29/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02167-APG-VCF Document 106 Filed 09/22/21 Page 7 of 7 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, et al., Plaintiff, 4 5 FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL vs. 6 Case No.: 2:17-CV-02167-APG-VCF RIVERWALK RANCH MASTER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al. 7 Defendants. 8 9 Honorable Andrew Gordon District Court Judge 10 The Court orders as follows: 11 IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. 12 13 Ricardo Fojas filed a crossclaim against Riverwalk Ranch Master Homeowners Association [ECF No. 18]. 2. 14 As set forth in this Court’s order from August 16, 2021, cross-claimant 15 Fojas accepted an offer of judgment from cross-defendant Riverwalk. ECF No. 16 105. 17 3. Fojas has received payment from Riverwalk. 18 4. Cross-claimant Fojas’ claims against cross-defendant Riverwalk are 19 dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing their respective attorney’s fees 20 and costs. 21 5. This Order disposes of all remaining claims in this case. 22 6. This case is dismissed is pursuant to the terms of this Order and prior 23 24 25 26 Orders of this Court and the Clerk shall enter a final judgment of dismissal IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Case No. 2:17-CV-02167-APG-VCF 27 28 September 29, 2021 DATED:____________________________________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?