Ayers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Filing
19
ORDER that 8 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The breach of fiduciary duty claim is dismissed with prejudice. The unfair practices claim is dismissed without prejudice. Ayers may file an amended complaint within 20 days of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
JOSHUA AYERS,
5
Case No. 2:17-cv-02171-APG-PAL
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
8
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE
TO AMEND
(ECF No. 8)
Defendant.
9
Plaintiff Joshua Ayers has insurance coverage through defendant State Farm Mutual
10
11
Automobile Insurance Company. Ayers was in an accident that totaled his car and injured him.
12
He filed a claim with State Farm because the other driver did not have adequate coverage. When
13
State Farm denied his claim, he filed this lawsuit. State Farm moves to dismiss two of his claims.
14
Because Ayers’s unfair practices claim lacks the required factual support and Ayers concedes the
15
breach of fiduciary duty claim should be dismissed, I grant the motion to dismiss with leave to
16
amend.
17
I.
Background
18
Ayers was in a car accident with another driver who did not have adequate insurance
19
coverage.1 His vehicle was totaled and he was physically and mentally injured.2 As a result,
20
Ayers had to rent a car.3 Ayers filed a claim with his insurer, State Farm, under his uninsured or
21
underinsured motorist coverage.4 State Farm ultimately denied his claim so Ayers filed a
22
complaint in Nevada state court against State Farm.5 State Farm removed the case and filed this
23
24
1
25
26
27
28
ECF No. 8, Ex. A.
2
Id.
3
Id.
4
Id.
5
Id.
1
motion to dismiss two of Ayers’s claims.6 State Farm argues that the breach of fiduciary duty
2
claim is not recognized under Nevada law and the unfair practices claim does not state the
3
statutory subsections State Farm allegedly violated or any facts supporting a violation.7 Ayers
4
concedes his breach of fiduciary duty claim should be dismissed.8 He argues that the unfair
5
practices claim is sufficiently pleaded under the state court standard, but requests leave to amend
6
if the complaint is deficient under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.9
7
II.
The federal rules apply in a removed action.10 In deciding a motion to dismiss, I must
8
9
Discussion
view the facts in the complaint as true and in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.11 Rule 8
10
requires factual support amounting to more than mere labels or recitations of the claim’s
11
elements.12 I may draw reasonable inferences from the facts in the complaint but I cannot rely on
12
legal conclusions to find that a claim is properly pleaded.13 I must dismiss any cause of action
13
that does not state a plausible claim for which relief can be granted.14 When dismissing a claim, I
14
may grant leave to amend when a claim can be remedied by adding facts.15
15
State Farm moves to dismiss Ayers’s unfair practices and breach of fiduciary duty claims.
16
Ayers concedes that I must dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty claim so I analyze only the unfair
17
practices claim.
18
19
20
21
22
23
6
ECF No. 8.
7
Id.
8
ECF No. 12 at 7.
9
Id.
25
26
27
28
10
FED. R. CIV. P. 81(c)(1).
11
24
Shwarz v. United States, 234 F.3d 428, 435 (9th Cir. 2000).
12
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).
13
Id.
14
Id. at 679.
15
Henry A. v. Willden, 678 F.3d 991, 1005 (9th Cir. 2012).
Page 2 of 3
The Nevada unfair practices statute lists sixteen practices by insurers that are considered
1
2
unfair.16 The complaint does not identify which of those State Farm allegedly violated or any
3
specific actions that State Farm took. Ayers makes conclusory statements as to State Farm’s
4
general acts or omissions in dealing with his insurance claim, but those allegations merely recite
5
the unfair practices statutory language.17 Ayers does not provide factual support to plausibly
6
allege that State Farm took improper actions or failed to act. These recitations are not enough for
7
me to make a reasonable inference as to State Farm’s alleged misconduct. Thus, I grant State
8
Farm’s motion to dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty and unfair practices claims. However,
9
because it is possible that Ayers could allege facts to plausibly state an unfair practices claim, I
10
grant leave to amend.
11
III.
Conclusion
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that State Farm’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 8) is
12
13
GRANTED. The breach of fiduciary duty claim is dismissed with prejudice. The unfair
14
practices claim is dismissed without prejudice. I grant leave to amend the complaint. Ayers may
15
file an amended complaint within 20 days of entry of this order. If he does not, the case will
16
proceed based on the remaining claims pleaded in the complaint.
DATED this 17th day of October, 2017.
17
18
19
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16
NEV. REV. STAT. § 686A.310(1)(a)–(p).
17
ECF No. 8, Ex. A.
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?