U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Summerhills Owners Association et al

Filing 20

ORDER Granting 19 Stipulation to Stay all proceedings in this lawsuit. The parties must file a joint status report on 5/31/2018 and every 90 days thereafter until the stay is lifted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02194-JCM-CWH Document 19 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP R. Samuel Ehlers, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9313 Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10115 alancaster@wrightlegal.net 7785 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 (702) 475-7965; Fax: (702) 946-1345 Attorneys for Plaintiff, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust; Case No.: 2:17-cv-02194-JCM-CWH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 SUMMERHILLS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit corporation; NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation; and DOES I through X, and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust (“U.S. 19 Bank”), and Defendant, Summerhills Owners Association (“HOA”), by and through their 20 respective counsels of record, hereby stipulates as follows in accordance with LR6-1 and LR 21 26-4. 22 “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to 23 control the disposition of the causes of action on its docket with economy of time and effort for 24 itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). “A trial 25 court may, with propriety, find it is efficient for its own docket and the fairest course for the 26 parties to enter a stay of an action before it, pending resolution of independent proceedings 27 which bear upon the case.” Leyva v. Certified Grocers of Cal., Ltd., 593 F.2d 857, 863 (9th Cir. 28 1979). In deciding whether to grant a stay, a court may weigh the following: (1) the possible Page 1 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-02194-JCM-CWH Document 19 Filed 03/01/18 Page 2 of 3 1 damage which may result from the granting of a stay; (2) the hardship or inequity which a party 2 may suffer in being required to go forward; (3) the orderly course of justice measured in terms 3 of the simplifying or complicating of issues, proof, and questions of law which could be 4 expected to result from a stay. CMAX, Inc. v. Hall, 300 F.2d 265, 268 (9th Cir. 1962). 5 6 WHEREAS the above-captioned matter concerns claims regarding real property located at 7555 Glowing Ember Ct #101, Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 (the “Property”). 7 WHEREAS, U.S. Bank is a party in a separate action titled, My Home Now, LLC v. 8 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-00727-GMN-NJK (“Buyer Action”), 9 regarding competing quiet title claims to the Property. Summary Judgment was entered in favor 10 of U.S. Bank in the Buyer Action. My Home Now, LLC has filed an appeal of the order 11 granting U.S. Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the Buyer Action (“Appeal”). 12 WHEREAS on January 26, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada 13 issued an Order in the Buyer Action holding: “due to the unconstitutional notice scheme, the 14 Court grants summary judgment for U.S. Bank and Caliber’s claim for quiet title and quiets title 15 as a matter of law in favor of U.S. Bank as assignee of the Deed of Trust.” ECF No. 84, 15:18- 16 20. 17 WHEREAS, the parties agree that the outcome of the Appeal will have a substantial 18 affect on this matter. The parties further agree that a temporary stay until that Appeal is decided 19 will preserve their own and judicial resources. Because the United States Court of Appeal for 20 the Ninth Circuit’s decision may alter or eliminate the need for discovery on many contested 21 issues, the Parties hereby stipulate to stay all proceedings in this Case until the Appeal is 22 resolved. 23 NOW WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that staying this case pending decision 25 from the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit on the Appeal will enable the 26 parties to present arguments and evidence to this Court at an appropriate time with complete 27 legal authority, thereby promoting the most efficient use of the Court’s and the parties’ limited 28 resources. Staying the case pending the decision from the United States Court of Appeal for the Page 2 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-02194-JCM-CWH Document 19 Filed 03/01/18 Page 3 of 3 1 Ninth Circuit on the Appeal will also enable the parties to commence settlement discussions. 2 IT IS FURTHER STIPLATED AND AGREED that either party may file a written 3 motion to lift stay at any time either party determines it appropriate, and either party may file an 4 opposition to the motion. 5 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that all proceedings in this lawsuit are 6 stayed, and all upcoming deadlines, hearings and conferences, including the deadline for the 7 HOA and U.S. Bank to file dispositive motions and the pre-trial order, shall be vacated pending 8 the stay. 9 DATED this 1st day of March, 2018. DATED this 1st day of March, 2018. WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP BOYACK ORME & ANTHONY /s/ Aaron D. Lancaster Aaron D Lancaster, Esq. 7785 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 Plaintiff, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust /s/ Christopher B. Anthony Edward D. Boyack, Esq. Christopher B. Anthony, Esq. 7432 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 101 Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorneys for Defendant Summerhills Owners Association 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file a joint status report on May 31, 2018, and every 90 days thereafter, until the ORDER stay is lifted. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 2, 2018 DATED this day of , 2018. 24 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 . 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?