U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Summerhills Owners Association et al
Filing
20
ORDER Granting 19 Stipulation to Stay all proceedings in this lawsuit. The parties must file a joint status report on 5/31/2018 and every 90 days thereafter until the stay is lifted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:17-cv-02194-JCM-CWH Document 19 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
R. Samuel Ehlers, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9313
Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10115
alancaster@wrightlegal.net
7785 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
(702) 475-7965; Fax: (702) 946-1345
Attorneys for Plaintiff, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9
Master Participation Trust;
Case No.: 2:17-cv-02194-JCM-CWH
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
15
16
SUMMERHILLS OWNERS ASSOCIATION,
a Nevada non-profit corporation; NEVADA
ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC., a Nevada
corporation; and DOES I through X, and ROE
CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust (“U.S.
19
Bank”), and Defendant, Summerhills Owners Association (“HOA”), by and through their
20
respective counsels of record, hereby stipulates as follows in accordance with LR6-1 and LR
21
26-4.
22
“[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to
23
control the disposition of the causes of action on its docket with economy of time and effort for
24
itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). “A trial
25
court may, with propriety, find it is efficient for its own docket and the fairest course for the
26
parties to enter a stay of an action before it, pending resolution of independent proceedings
27
which bear upon the case.” Leyva v. Certified Grocers of Cal., Ltd., 593 F.2d 857, 863 (9th Cir.
28
1979). In deciding whether to grant a stay, a court may weigh the following: (1) the possible
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-cv-02194-JCM-CWH Document 19 Filed 03/01/18 Page 2 of 3
1
damage which may result from the granting of a stay; (2) the hardship or inequity which a party
2
may suffer in being required to go forward; (3) the orderly course of justice measured in terms
3
of the simplifying or complicating of issues, proof, and questions of law which could be
4
expected to result from a stay. CMAX, Inc. v. Hall, 300 F.2d 265, 268 (9th Cir. 1962).
5
6
WHEREAS the above-captioned matter concerns claims regarding real property located
at 7555 Glowing Ember Ct #101, Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 (the “Property”).
7
WHEREAS, U.S. Bank is a party in a separate action titled, My Home Now, LLC v.
8
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-00727-GMN-NJK (“Buyer Action”),
9
regarding competing quiet title claims to the Property. Summary Judgment was entered in favor
10
of U.S. Bank in the Buyer Action. My Home Now, LLC has filed an appeal of the order
11
granting U.S. Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the Buyer Action (“Appeal”).
12
WHEREAS on January 26, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
13
issued an Order in the Buyer Action holding: “due to the unconstitutional notice scheme, the
14
Court grants summary judgment for U.S. Bank and Caliber’s claim for quiet title and quiets title
15
as a matter of law in favor of U.S. Bank as assignee of the Deed of Trust.” ECF No. 84, 15:18-
16
20.
17
WHEREAS, the parties agree that the outcome of the Appeal will have a substantial
18
affect on this matter. The parties further agree that a temporary stay until that Appeal is decided
19
will preserve their own and judicial resources. Because the United States Court of Appeal for
20
the Ninth Circuit’s decision may alter or eliminate the need for discovery on many contested
21
issues, the Parties hereby stipulate to stay all proceedings in this Case until the Appeal is
22
resolved.
23
NOW WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing,
24
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that staying this case pending decision
25
from the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit on the Appeal will enable the
26
parties to present arguments and evidence to this Court at an appropriate time with complete
27
legal authority, thereby promoting the most efficient use of the Court’s and the parties’ limited
28
resources. Staying the case pending the decision from the United States Court of Appeal for the
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:17-cv-02194-JCM-CWH Document 19 Filed 03/01/18 Page 3 of 3
1
Ninth Circuit on the Appeal will also enable the parties to commence settlement discussions.
2
IT IS FURTHER STIPLATED AND AGREED that either party may file a written
3
motion to lift stay at any time either party determines it appropriate, and either party may file an
4
opposition to the motion.
5
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that all proceedings in this lawsuit are
6
stayed, and all upcoming deadlines, hearings and conferences, including the deadline for the
7
HOA and U.S. Bank to file dispositive motions and the pre-trial order, shall be vacated pending
8
the stay.
9
DATED this 1st day of March, 2018.
DATED this 1st day of March, 2018.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
BOYACK ORME & ANTHONY
/s/ Aaron D. Lancaster
Aaron D Lancaster, Esq.
7785 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Plaintiff, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as
Trustee for LSF9 Master
Participation Trust
/s/ Christopher B. Anthony
Edward D. Boyack, Esq.
Christopher B. Anthony, Esq.
7432 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 101
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Defendant Summerhills Owners
Association
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file a
joint status report on May 31, 2018, and every 90 days thereafter, until the
ORDER
stay is lifted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 2, 2018
DATED this
day of
, 2018.
24
25
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
.
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?