Leys v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation re Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 5/14/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/12/2018. Motions due by 6/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Charles Abbott (SBN 13811) Law Offices of Charles Abbott, PC 2150 Park Place, Suite 100 El Segundo, CA 90245 (310) 792-8665 cabbott@cabbottlaw.com Ronald H. Reynolds (SBN 827) Harrison J. Reynolds (SBN 13748) Reynolds & Associates 823 Las Vegas Blvd. S., Suite #280 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 445-7000 (702) 385-7743 Attorneys for Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 13 SYLVIA LEYS, 14 15 16 Case Number: 2:17-cv-02196-APG-VCF Plaintiff, v. 18 WAL-MART STORES, INC., dba Wal-Mart Store #4356 a foreign corporation; MARLON HUGHES; DOES I through XXX, inclusive and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through XXX, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER Filed in Compliance with LR 26-4 (First Request) 1 Under Local Rule 26-4, the parties, through their respective counsel, request the Court 2 extend the discovery cutoff for ninety (90) days. This is the first request for an extension of 3 discovery deadlines. 4 Status Report: The parties conducted a Rule 26(f) conference on August 28, 2017 and 5 filed a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order (ECF No. 7) on August 30, 2017, setting 6 the discovery deadline for February 13, 2018. This action involves an accident at a retail store 7 operated by Defendant Wal-Mart Store, Inc. (“Walmart”). The accident resulted in severe and 8 debilitating injuries to Plaintiff who has over $900,000 in medical damages to date. Under LR 26- 9 4, the deadline to request an extension of discovery deadlines is January 23, 2018. While the 10 parties have been working diligently to complete the remaining discovery within the deadlines, 11 the parties request a ninety (90) day extension of the discovery deadlines for the following 12 reasons: 13 14 15 1. Walmart served its initial disclosures on September 1, 2017. Plaintiff served her responses on October 4, 2017. Plaintiff’s initial disclosures contained documents. 2. Plaintiff served her First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production and 16 Requests for Admission on September 18, 2017. Walmart served its responses to all written 17 discovery on October 25, 2017. Besides its written responses, Walmart also produced documents 18 responsive to Plaintiff’s document requests. 19 3. Walmart served its First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production on 20 September 6, 2017. Plaintiff served her responses on October 18, 2017. On November 14, 2017, 21 Walmart identified deficient responses in both the interrogatories and document requests. The 22 parties are working in good faith to resolve Walmart’s concerns without judicial intervention. 23 4. Resolution of the Plaintiff’s responses to Walmart’s document requests is critical 24 for Walmart’s medical expert before Plaintiff’s physical examination under Fed. R. Civ. P. 35. 25 Walmart believes that Plaintiff was involved in workplace and automobile accidents, months 26 before the incident at the Walmart store, which caused injuries to body parts she alleges Walmart 27 negligently caused. The parties are working in good faith to resolve Walmart’s concerns about 28 -2Joint Stipulation to Extend Discovery 1 2 Plaintiff’s document production. 5. Plaintiff deposed three percipient witnesses on November 14 and 15, 2017. 3 Plaintiff may depose other witnesses, including Walmart’s representative under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 30(b)(6). Walmart plans to depose Plaintiff and her percipient witnesses once Walmart is 5 satisfied that Plaintiff has completed her discovery obligations. Both sides plan to conduct expert 6 depositions. Given the amount of medical providers and lien holders in this $1 million claim, 7 Walmart expects many depositions. 8 6. On December 3, 2017, Walmart requested Plaintiff’s counsel to stipulate to a 9 mental examination under Fed. R. Civ. P. 35. Walmart selected Dr. Louis Etcoff, a forensic 10 psychiatrist, to perform the evaluation, but his next appointment is in February 2018. Walmart 11 believes that a report drafted by Plaintiff’s psychiatrist, who Plaintiff identified as a non-retained 12 expert, provides ample support for a mental examination. Plaintiff agreed to respond to 13 Walmart’s request for a mental examination by December 18, 2017. 14 15 16 17 7. On November 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand. Walmart’s response is due by December 11, 2107. New Deadlines: Therefore, the parties propose a 90-day extension with these discovery deadlines: 18 1. Discovery cut off: May 14, 2018 19 2. Filing Motions to Amend deadline passed 20 3. Initial Expert Disclosure March 15, 2018 21 4. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure April 16, 2018 22 5. Dispositive Motions June 13, 2018 23 6. Pretrial Order: A pretrial order shall be filed by July 12, 2018. But, if any 24 dispositive motions are filed, the Joint Pretrial Order shall be due thirty days after decision of 25 such motion(s). Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections shall be included in 26 the Joint Pretrial Order. 27 28 Electronic Discovery: The parties have located no significant relevant information, -3Joint Stipulation to Extend Discovery 1 stored in an electronic format. The parties agree to produce any electronically stored information 2 in paper and/or pdf format. If the parties learn that electronically stored information is available 3 and would affect this case, the parties will meet and confer about the production of that 4 information in an acceptable format. 5 6 7 Dated: December 12, 2017 Ladah Law Firm, PLLC Dated: December 12, 2017 Law Offices of Charles Abbott 8 9 10 11 12 13 By: /s/ Ramzy Ladah Ramzy P. Ladah, Esq. (SBN 11405) 517 S. Third Street Las Vegas, CA 89101 By: /s/ Charles Abbott Charles Abbott (SBN 13811) 2150 Park Place, Suite 100 El Segundo, CA 90245 Attorney for Plaintiff, Sylvia Leys Attorney for Defendants, Kevin Prentice and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. IT IS SO ORDERED: 14 15 16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 DATED: December 13, 2017 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4Joint Stipulation to Extend Discovery

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?