Leys v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
23
ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation re Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 5/14/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/12/2018. Motions due by 6/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Charles Abbott (SBN 13811)
Law Offices of Charles Abbott, PC
2150 Park Place, Suite 100
El Segundo, CA 90245
(310) 792-8665
cabbott@cabbottlaw.com
Ronald H. Reynolds (SBN 827)
Harrison J. Reynolds (SBN 13748)
Reynolds & Associates
823 Las Vegas Blvd. S., Suite #280
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 445-7000
(702) 385-7743
Attorneys for Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
13
SYLVIA LEYS,
14
15
16
Case Number: 2:17-cv-02196-APG-VCF
Plaintiff,
v.
18
WAL-MART STORES, INC., dba Wal-Mart
Store #4356 a foreign corporation; MARLON
HUGHES; DOES I through XXX, inclusive and
ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through XXX,
inclusive,
19
Defendants.
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN AND
SCHEDULING ORDER
Filed in Compliance with LR 26-4
(First Request)
1
Under Local Rule 26-4, the parties, through their respective counsel, request the Court
2
extend the discovery cutoff for ninety (90) days. This is the first request for an extension of
3
discovery deadlines.
4
Status Report: The parties conducted a Rule 26(f) conference on August 28, 2017 and
5
filed a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order (ECF No. 7) on August 30, 2017, setting
6
the discovery deadline for February 13, 2018. This action involves an accident at a retail store
7
operated by Defendant Wal-Mart Store, Inc. (“Walmart”). The accident resulted in severe and
8
debilitating injuries to Plaintiff who has over $900,000 in medical damages to date. Under LR 26-
9
4, the deadline to request an extension of discovery deadlines is January 23, 2018. While the
10
parties have been working diligently to complete the remaining discovery within the deadlines,
11
the parties request a ninety (90) day extension of the discovery deadlines for the following
12
reasons:
13
14
15
1.
Walmart served its initial disclosures on September 1, 2017. Plaintiff served her
responses on October 4, 2017. Plaintiff’s initial disclosures contained documents.
2.
Plaintiff served her First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production and
16
Requests for Admission on September 18, 2017. Walmart served its responses to all written
17
discovery on October 25, 2017. Besides its written responses, Walmart also produced documents
18
responsive to Plaintiff’s document requests.
19
3.
Walmart served its First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production on
20
September 6, 2017. Plaintiff served her responses on October 18, 2017. On November 14, 2017,
21
Walmart identified deficient responses in both the interrogatories and document requests. The
22
parties are working in good faith to resolve Walmart’s concerns without judicial intervention.
23
4.
Resolution of the Plaintiff’s responses to Walmart’s document requests is critical
24
for Walmart’s medical expert before Plaintiff’s physical examination under Fed. R. Civ. P. 35.
25
Walmart believes that Plaintiff was involved in workplace and automobile accidents, months
26
before the incident at the Walmart store, which caused injuries to body parts she alleges Walmart
27
negligently caused. The parties are working in good faith to resolve Walmart’s concerns about
28
-2Joint Stipulation to Extend Discovery
1
2
Plaintiff’s document production.
5.
Plaintiff deposed three percipient witnesses on November 14 and 15, 2017.
3
Plaintiff may depose other witnesses, including Walmart’s representative under Fed. R. Civ. P.
4
30(b)(6). Walmart plans to depose Plaintiff and her percipient witnesses once Walmart is
5
satisfied that Plaintiff has completed her discovery obligations. Both sides plan to conduct expert
6
depositions. Given the amount of medical providers and lien holders in this $1 million claim,
7
Walmart expects many depositions.
8
6.
On December 3, 2017, Walmart requested Plaintiff’s counsel to stipulate to a
9
mental examination under Fed. R. Civ. P. 35. Walmart selected Dr. Louis Etcoff, a forensic
10
psychiatrist, to perform the evaluation, but his next appointment is in February 2018. Walmart
11
believes that a report drafted by Plaintiff’s psychiatrist, who Plaintiff identified as a non-retained
12
expert, provides ample support for a mental examination. Plaintiff agreed to respond to
13
Walmart’s request for a mental examination by December 18, 2017.
14
15
16
17
7.
On November 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand. Walmart’s response is
due by December 11, 2107.
New Deadlines: Therefore, the parties propose a 90-day extension with these discovery
deadlines:
18
1. Discovery cut off:
May 14, 2018
19
2. Filing Motions to Amend
deadline passed
20
3. Initial Expert Disclosure
March 15, 2018
21
4. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure
April 16, 2018
22
5. Dispositive Motions
June 13, 2018
23
6. Pretrial Order: A pretrial order shall be filed by July 12, 2018. But, if any
24
dispositive motions are filed, the Joint Pretrial Order shall be due thirty days after decision of
25
such motion(s). Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections shall be included in
26
the Joint Pretrial Order.
27
28
Electronic Discovery: The parties have located no significant relevant information,
-3Joint Stipulation to Extend Discovery
1
stored in an electronic format. The parties agree to produce any electronically stored information
2
in paper and/or pdf format. If the parties learn that electronically stored information is available
3
and would affect this case, the parties will meet and confer about the production of that
4
information in an acceptable format.
5
6
7
Dated: December 12, 2017
Ladah Law Firm, PLLC
Dated: December 12, 2017
Law Offices of Charles Abbott
8
9
10
11
12
13
By: /s/ Ramzy Ladah
Ramzy P. Ladah, Esq. (SBN 11405)
517 S. Third Street
Las Vegas, CA 89101
By: /s/ Charles Abbott
Charles Abbott (SBN 13811)
2150 Park Place, Suite 100
El Segundo, CA 90245
Attorney for Plaintiff, Sylvia Leys
Attorney for Defendants, Kevin Prentice and
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
14
15
16
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
DATED:
December 13, 2017
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4Joint Stipulation to Extend Discovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?