Leys v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
38
ORDER that 35 and 36 Walmart's Motions to Compel are GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Nevada Spine Clinic and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center have until May 3, 2018 to designate a person to appear for a deposition. FURTHER ORDERED that Nevada Spin e Clinic and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center have until May 3, 2018 to produce documents or otherwise respond to Walmart's document requests. FURTHER ORDERED that Walmart must serve a copy of this order on Nevada Spine Clinic and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center by April 19, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
5
SYLVIA LEYS,
6
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
vs.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
2:17-cv-02196-APG-VCF
ORDER
MOTIONS TO COMPEL DEPOSITIONS [ECF NOS. 35
& 36]
10
11
12
Before the Court are Defendant Wal-Mart Stores’ (“Walmart”) Motions to Compel the Depositions
13
of the Nevada Spine Clinic (ECF No. 35) and the Smoke Ranch Surgery Center (ECF No. 36). For the
14
reasons stated below, Walmart’s motions are granted.
15
The Plaintiff in this case alleges that she was injured at Walmart. (ECF No. 15 at 2-3). Plaintiff
16
has been treated at Nevada Spine Clinic and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center. (ECF No. 35 at 3, ECF No.
17
36 at 3). Walmart served deposition subpoenas on Nevada Spine Clinic and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center
18
relating to Plaintiff’s treatment, asking for a representative to testify and produce certain documents at a
19
deposition. (ECF No. 35 at 3, ECF No. 36 at 3). The medical/legal coordinator for the entities stated that
20
no corporate representative would be available. (ECF No. 35 at 3-4, ECF No. 36 at 3-4). Walmart called
21
and emailed the coordinator, but received no response. (ECF No. 35-2 at 2, ECF No. 36-2 at 2).
22
Walmart now moves to compel compliance with its deposition subpoenas. (ECF No. 35 at 4; ECF
23
No. 36 at 4). Walmart argues that evidence regarding the reasonableness of costs charged by the Nevada
24
Spine Clinic and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center is relevant. (ECF No. 35 at 5; ECF No. 36 at 5). Walmart
25
1
served copies of its motions to compel on Nevada Spine Clinic and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center (ECF
2
No. 37), but the entities have not filed any response to the motions.
3
“Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's
4
claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). When an individual
5
objects to discovery, a party may move for an order compelling compliance. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(2)(B)(i).
6
Under LCR 47-3, “[t]he failure of an opposing party to include points and authorities in response to any
7
motion constitutes a consent to granting the motion.”
8
The discovery Walmart seeks is relevant and proportional to the needs of the case. Information
9
regarding the reasonableness of costs charged by Nevada Spine Clinic and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center
10
for Plaintiff’s treatment is relevant to Walmart’s defense. In addition, Nevada Spine Clinic and Smoke
11
Ranch Surgery Center have failed to oppose Walmart’s motions to compel, thereby consenting to the
12
Court’s granting of the motions.
13
Accordingly, and for good cause shown,
14
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Walmart’s Motions to Compel the Depositions of the Nevada
15
16
17
18
19
20
Spine Clinic (ECF No. 35) and the Smoke Ranch Surgery Center (ECF No. 36) are GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Nevada Spine Clinic and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center have
until May 3, 2018 to designate a person to appear for a deposition.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Nevada Spine Clinic and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center have
until May 3, 2018 to produce documents or otherwise respond to Walmart’s document requests.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Walmart must serve a copy of this order on Nevada Spine Clinic
21
and Smoke Ranch Surgery Center by April 19, 2018.
22
DATED this 16th day of April, 2018.
23
24
25
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?