T.R.P. Company, Inc. v. Similasan AG et al

Filing 180

ORDER granting 179 Stipulation with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02197-JCM-DJA Document 179 Filed 10/27/20 Page 1 of 3 180 10/30/20 1 DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC MICHAEL N. FEDER, Nevada Bar No. 7332 2 Email: mfeder@dickinson-wright.com 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 800 3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Tel: (702) 550-4400 4 Fax: (844) 670-6009 5 VENABLE LLP DANIEL S. SILVERMAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 6 Email: dssilverman@venable.com 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2300 7 Los Angeles, California 90067 Tel: (310) 229-0373 8 Fax: (310) 229-9901 9 VENABLE LLP MEAGHAN H. KENT (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 10 Email: mhkent@venable.com 600 Massachusetts Ave., NW 11 Washington, DC 20001 Tel: (202) 344-4000 12 Fax: (202) 344-8300 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant 13 T.R.P. Company, Inc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 16 CASE NO: 2:17-cv-02197-JCM-CWH T.R.P. Company, Inc., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 17 18 vs. 19 Similasan AG and Similasan Corporation, 20 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Defendants/Counter-Claimants. 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff T.R.P. Company, Inc. (“TRP”) 23 and Defendants Similasan Corporation and Similasan AG, through their respective counsel of 24 record, that this Court dismiss this Action, including TRP’s Complaint and Similasan 25 Corporation’s Counterclaim, with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Case 2:17-cv-02197-JCM-DJA Document 179 Filed 10/27/20 Page 2 of 3 180 10/30/20 1 41(a)(1)(A) as the parties have reached a settlement in this Action. Each party shall bear its own 2 attorneys’ fees and costs. 3 DATED this 27th day of October, 2020. DATED this 27th day of October, 2020. 4 DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC CROWELL & MORING LLP 5 /s/: Michael N. Feder MICHAEL N. FEDER (NV Bar No. 7332) 3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Suite 800 Las Vegas, NV 89169 /s/: Valerie Goo VALERIE GOO (Pro Hac Vice) RAIJA J. HORSTMAN (Pro Hac Vice) 515 S. Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 VENABLE LLP Daniel S. Silverman (Pro Hac Vice) 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2300 Los Angeles, CA 90067 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP Arthur Zorio (NV Bar No. 6547) Michael D. Rounds (NV Bar No. 4734) 5371 Kietzke Lane Reno, NV 89511 Email: azorio@bhfs.com VENABLE LLP Meaghan H. Kent (Pro Hac Vice) 600 Massachusetts Avenue., NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Attorneys for Plaintiff T.R.P. Company, Inc. Emily Ellis (NV Bar No. 11956) 100 North City Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89106-4614 14 Counsel for Defendants SIMILASAN CORPORATION and SIMILASAN AG 15 16 17 18 19 20 *** ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DATED: 24 25 26 27 28 2 October 30, 2020 Case 2:17-cv-02197-JCM-DJA Document 179 Filed 10/27/20 Page 3 of 3 180 10/30/20 From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Su, Thai X. <TXSu@Venable.com> Tuesday, October 27, 2020 9:52 AM Michael N. Feder Kent, Meaghan H.; Silverman, Daniel S.; Ross, Sarah H.; Elsa P. Amoroso RE: EXTERNAL: Stipulation of Dismissal for Filing Today / Tomorrow Hi Michael: We have authority from Valerie Goo to e-sign on her behalf. Please file the stipulation today when you get the chance. Thanks for all your help! Thai Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com) From: Su, Thai X. <TXSu@Venable.com> Date: Monday, Oct 26, 2020, 6:24 PM To: Michael N. Feder <MFeder@dickinson-wright.com> Cc: Kent, Meaghan H. <MHKent@Venable.com>, Silverman, Daniel S. <DSSilverman@Venable.com>, Ross, Sarah H. <shross@venable.com>, Elsa P. Amoroso <EAmoroso@dickinson-wright.com> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Stipulation of Dismissal for Filing Today / Tomorrow Thanks Michael. I assume it’s Valerie Goo, but I asked her to confirm we have her authority to e-sign her name. Will get back to you as soon as she responds. Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com) 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?