Burdo v. Berryhill

Filing 21

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 20 Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's report and recommendation is accepted, 14 plaintiff Rickie Burdo's motion for reversal or remand is DENIED, and 17 defendants motion to affirm is GRANTED. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/3/2019.; Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 RICKIE L. BURDO, 4 Case No.: 2:17-cv-02203-APG-VCF Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion to Remand, and Granting Motion to Affirm 6 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, [ECF Nos. 14, 17, 20] 5 v. 7 Defendant 8 9 On December 13, 2018, Magistrate Judge Ferenbach recommended that I deny plaintiff 10 Rickie Burdo’s motion for reversal or remand and grant the defendant’s motion to affirm. ECF 11 No. 20. Burdo did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of 12 the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de 13 novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which 14 objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en 15 banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de 16 novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach’s report and 18 recommendation (ECF No. 20) is accepted, plaintiff Rickie Burdo’s motion for reversal or 19 remand (ECF No. 14) is DENIED, and defendant’s motion to affirm (ECF No. 17) is 20 GRANTED. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of the defendant and 21 against the plaintiff. 22 DATED this 3rd day of January, 2019. 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?