Ransom v. Hartford Insurance Company Of The Midwest
Filing
17
ORDER granting 11 Motion to Remand to State Court. 10/30/2017 hearing is Vacated as moot. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: State Court with Certified Docket - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
Kyle Thomas Ransom,
2:17-cv-02257-JAD-GWF
Plaintiff
4
Order Remanding Case to State Court
5
v.
6
[ECF No. 11]
Hartford Insurance Co. of the Midwest,
7
Defendant
8
9
10
On September 19, 2017, plaintiff Kyle Thomas Ransom moved to remand this insurance-
11
coverage dispute back to state court because the case value does not meet the $75,000
12
jurisdictional threshold.1 Hartford Insurance’s deadline to oppose the motion to remand was
13
October 3, 2017; it filed no opposition and has not sought to extend the deadline to do so. Local
14
Rule 7-2(d) states that “The failure of a moving party to file points and authorities in response to
15
any motion . . . constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion.” And the defendant always
16
has the burden of establishing that removal is proper.2 I construe Hartford’s failure to oppose the
17
motion to remand as its acknowledgment that jurisdiction is lacking, and I GRANT the Motion to
18
Remand.
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Remand [ECF No. 11] is
20
GRANTED. This case is remanded back to the Eighth Judicial District Court for Clark County,
21
Nevada, Case No. A-17-758064-C, Dept. 26. The Clerk of Court is directed to VACATE as
22
moot the 10/30/17 hearing in this case.
23
DATED: October 10, 2017.
24
_______________________________
____________ ___
_ ________
____
___
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A Dorsey
ict Judge Jennifer A.
t udg
ni
n e
25
26
27
28
1
ECF No. 11.
2
Gaus v. Miles, 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 1992).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?