Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Hunt et al

Filing 17

Second Amended ORDER Approving 14 Motion to Compromise Claims of Minors. See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7
8

GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY
INSURANCE COMPANY,

SECOND AMENDED ORDER
Plaintiff(s),

9
v.

10
11

Case No. 2:17-CV-2260 JCM (PAL)

AMBER HUNT, et al.,
Defendant(s).

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

Presently before the court is Amber Hunt’s (“petitioner”) petition for approval to
compromise claims of minors. (ECF No. 14).
In the present petition, the natural mother and legal custodial parent of Jayda Madison Hunt
and Jameson Alwin Hunt (the “minor claimants”), petitions the court to approve the proposed
compromise of the claims of the minor claimants, as set forth in the settlement agreement. (ECF
No. 14).
On April 8, 2003, plaintiff Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company (“Genworth”)
issued the flexible premium adjustable life insurance policy no. 6706243 (the “policy”) to Jeremy
Hunt (the “insured”), former husband of the petitioner, and now-deceased father of the minor
claimants. (ECF No. 14). The insured designated his then-wife, the petitioner, as the sole primary
beneficiary of the policy and Jared Hunt, the insured’s adult son from a previous marriage, as the
sole contingency beneficiary. Id. During the insured and petitioner’s marriage, the couple had
two children, the minor claimants. Id.
On October 25, 2011, petitioner and the insured were divorced, however, the insured did
not submit a change of beneficiary to Genworth at any time. (ECF No. 14). On August 22, 2016,

1

the insured died. Id. The death benefit of the policy is $1,000,000.00. Id. Upon the insured’s

2

death, both petitioner and Jared Hunt, the insured’s adult son, contacted Genworth to assert

3

competing claims to the death benefit. Id. Genworth notified both petitioner and Jared Hunt that

4

the death benefit had been reduced by a loan that the insured took against the policy, reducing the

5

death benefit total to $967,474.05. Id.

6

Jared Hunt and petitioner, on behalf of herself and the minor claimants, were able to

7

amicably resolve their competing claims to the death benefit. (ECF No. 14). Accordingly,

8

Genworth, Jared Hunt, and the petitioner entered into a settlement agreement with the following

9

terms:

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

(1) Within forty-five (45) days upon the granting of the instant Petition, Genworth
shall distribute the Net Death Benefit equally among Jared Hunt (25%), Petitioner
Amber Hunt (25%), Jayda Madison Hunt (25%) and Jameson Alwin Hunt (25%)
(“Agreement”);
(2) The distribution checks to Jameson and Jayda shall be made payable to Amber
Hunt for the benefit of each minor and shall be deposited in respective blocked
financial investments for their benefit in accordance with Nevada Revised Statute
§ 41.200(5);
(3) The Settlement Agreement becomes effective upon this Court’s approval
thereof;
(4) Global mutual releases;

18

(5) Dismissal of the Instant Action within ten (10) days of full distribution by
Genworth; and

19

(ECF No. 14).

20

Petitioner believes acceptance of the terms set forth in the settlement agreement is

21

in the best interest of the minor claimants. (ECF No. 14).

22

Pursuant to NRS 41.200, “[i]f an unemancipated minor has a disputed claim for money

23

against a third person, either parent . . . . has the right to compromise the claim. Such a compromise

24

is not effective until it is approved by the district court of the county where the minor resides, or

25

if the minor is not a resident of the State of Nevada, then by the district court of the county where

26

the claim was incurred, upon a verified petition in writing, regularly filed with the court.” Section

27

(2) of NRS 41.200 sets forth the requirements of the petition, which include information about the

28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-2-

1

incident, the minor, the guardian, the total amount of proceeds of the compromise and how those

2

funds are to be distributed. NRS 41.200.

3

Further, the petition must explain why the compromise is in the best interest of the minor,

4

and demonstrate “that petitioner has been advised and understands that acceptance of the

5

compromise will bar the minor from seeking further relief from the third person offering the

6

compromise.” Id.

7

In accordance with NRS 41.200, petitioner explains the incident—the death of the insured,

8

her ex-husband—and the resulting settlement agreement between her, on behalf of herself and the

9

two minor claimants, and Jared Hunt. (ECF No. 14). The petition also states that the minor

10

claimants live with petitioner in Clark County, Nevada. Id.

11

Petitioner also explains why the settlement agreement will be in the best interest of the

12

minor claimants and that she “understands that acceptance of the compromise will bar the [m]inor

13

[c]laimants from seeking further relief from either Jared [Hunt] or Genworth. . . .” (ECF No. 14 at

14

6). Further, petitioner asserts that pursuant to NRS 41.200(5), after the proceeds are deposited into

15

her attorney’s trust account, petitioner will promptly establish a blocked financial investment

16

account for each of the minor claimants, and deposit their respective settlement proceeds

17

($241,868.51) for their exclusive use and benefit. (ECF No. 14).

18
19

In light of the aforementioned, the court is inclined to approve the submitted compromise
between petitioner, on behalf of herself and the minor claimants, Jared Hunt, and Genworth.

20

Accordingly,

21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner Amber Hunt’s petition for compromise of

22

disputed claim of minors, Jayda Madison Hunt and Jameson Alwin Hunt (ECF No. 14) be, and the

23

same hereby is, APPROVED.

24

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Genworth Life and

25

Annuity Insurance Company pay the sum of $241,868.51 to each Jayda Madison Hunt and

26

Jameson Alwin Hunt in consideration for full liability release and final discharge for all claims,

27

charges and demands arising out of the above described life insurance policy.

28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-3-

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to NRS 41.200, the sums are to be paid to the

2

mother of the children, Amber Hunt, and then placed in blocked financial investment accounts in

3

the name of each child and maintained in accordance with sections (5) through (8) of NRS 41.200.

4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of receipt of the sums from

5

Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company, petitioner Amber Hunt will file with the court

6

proof that the blocked financial investment accounts have been established.

7
8
9

DATED April 13, 2018.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-4-