Halwix v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
3
ORDER granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall file the complaint, serve the Commissioner of Social Security via certified mail, and issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
RAYMOND HALWIX,
8
9
10
11
12
13
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
)
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL )
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:17-cv-02263-APG-CWH
ORDER
Presently before the court is Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1),
14
15
filed on August 25, 2017.
16
I.
17
In Forma Pauperis Application
Plaintiff has submitted the declaration required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing an inability to
18
prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma
19
pauperis will be granted.
20
II.
21
Screening the Complaint
Upon granting a request to proceed in forma pauperis, a court must screen the complaint under
22
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). In screening the complaint, a court must identify cognizable claims and
23
dismiss claims that are frivolous, malicious, file to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seek
24
monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Dismissal
25
for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2) incorporates the standard for failure to state a claim under
26
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012). To
27
survive § 1915 review, a complaint must “contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a
28
claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).
1
In considering whether the complaint is sufficient to state a claim, all allegations of material fact
2
are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Wyler Summit P’ship v.
3
Turner Broad. Sys. Inc., 135 F.3d 658, 661 (9th Cir. 1998) (citation omitted). Although the standard
4
under Rule 12(b)(6) does not require detailed factual allegations, a plaintiff must provide more than
5
mere labels and conclusions. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). A formulaic
6
recitation of the elements of a cause of action is insufficient. Id. Unless it is clear the complaint’s
7
deficiencies could not be cured through amendment, a plaintiff should be given leave to amend the
8
complaint with notice regarding the complaint’s deficiencies. Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103,
9
1106 (9th Cir. 1995).
10
If a plaintiff’s complaint challenges a decision by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”),
11
before filing a lawsuit, the plaintiff must exhaust administrative remedies. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); see
12
also Bass v. Social Sec. Admin., 872 F.2d 832, 833 (9th Cir. 1989) (per curiam) (“Section 405(g)
13
provides that a civil action may be brought only after (1) the claimant has been party to a hearing held
14
by the Secretary, and (2) the Secretary has made a final decision on the claim”). Generally, if the SSA
15
denies a claimant’s application for disability benefits, the claimant may request reconsideration of the
16
decision. If the claim is denied at the reconsideration level, a claimant may request a hearing before an
17
administrative law judge (“ALJ”). If the ALJ denies the claim, a claimant may request review of the
18
decision by the Appeals Council. If the Appeals Council declines to review the ALJ’s decision, a
19
claimant may then request judicial review. See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 404, 416.
20
Once a plaintiff has exhausted administrative remedies, he may obtain judicial review of a SSA
21
decision denying benefits by filing suit within 60 days after notice of a final decision. Id. An action for
22
judicial review of a determination by the SSA must be brought “in the district court of the United States
23
for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides.” Id. The complaint should state the nature of
24
Plaintiff’s disability, when Plaintiff claims he became disabled, and when and how he exhausted his
25
administrative remedies. The complaint should also contain a plain, short, and concise statement
26
identifying the nature of Plaintiff’s disagreement with the determination made by the Social Security
27
Administration and show that Plaintiff is entitled to relief. A district court can affirm, modify, reverse,
28
or remand a decision if Plaintiff has exhausted his administrative remedies and timely filed a civil
2
1
action. However, judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny benefits is limited to
2
determining: (a) whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the findings of
3
the Commissioner; and (b) whether the correct legal standards were applied. Morgan v. Commissioner
4
of the Social Security Adm., 169 F.3d 595, 599 (9th Cir. 1999).
5
Here, Plaintiff alleges that on June 26, 2017, the Appeals Council denied his request for review,
6
and, at that time, the ALJ’s decision became the final decision of the Commissioner. Thus, it appears
7
Plaintiff has exhausted her administrative remedies. Additionally, Plaintiff’s complaint includes
8
sufficient facts to state a claim for relief.
9
Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing therefore,
10
IT IS ORDERED that:
11
1.
12
13
Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff will not
be required to pay the filing fee of $400.00.
2.
Plaintiff is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the necessity of
14
prepayment of any additional fees or costs or giving security for them. This Order granting leave to
15
proceed in forma pauperis does not extend to the issuance of subpoenas at government expense.
16
3.
The Clerk of Court must file the Complaint.
17
4.
The Clerk of the Court must serve the Commissioner of the Social Security
18
Administration by sending a copy of the summons and Complaint by certified mail to: (1) Office of
19
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration, 160 Spear St., Suite 899, San
20
Francisco, California 94105-1545; and (2) the Attorney General of the United States, Department of
21
Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4400, Washington, D.C. 20530.
22
23
24
5.
The Clerk of Court must issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of
Nevada and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service.
6.
From this point forward, Plaintiff must serve on Defendant or, if appearance has been
25
entered by an attorney, on the attorney, a copy of every pleading, motion or other document submitted
26
for consideration by the court. Plaintiff must include with the original paper submitted for filing a
27
certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was personally served or sent by
28
mail to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. The court may disregard any paper received by a
3
1
district judge or magistrate judge that has not been filed with the Clerk, and any paper received by a
2
district judge, magistrate judge or the Clerk that fails to include a certificate of service.
3
4
DATED: November 16, 2017
5
6
______________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?