Hodges v. Pepsi Bottling Co

Filing 28

ORDER granting ECF No. 27 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9017 HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP 1785 East Sahara Ave., Suite 325 Las Vegas, NV 89104 Tel: (702) 625-3893 Fax: (702) 625-3893 E-mail: jfoley@hkm.com Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DOUGLAS HODGES, An Individual ) ) Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. 2:17-cv-02268-MMD-VCF ) vs. ) ) PEPSI BOTTLING COMPANY, a Foreign ) Corporation, DOES I -X; ROE ) CORPORATIONS I -X ) ) Defendants. ) ) 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff DOUGLAS 19 HODGES and Defendant Grayhawk Leasing, LLC d/b/a Pepsi Beverage Company (“PEPSI”) 20 by and through their respective counsel, that DOUGLAS HODGES’s complaint against PEPSI 21 be dismissed with prejudice, 22 /// 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 Page 1 of 2 1 each party to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 3 Dated this 24th day of January, 2018. Dated this 24th day of January, 2018. HKM Employment Attorneys LLP Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 4 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Jenny L. Foley /s/ Suzanne L. Martin Jenny L. Foley, Ph.D., Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9017 1785 East Sahara Ave., Suite 325 Las Vegas, Nevada 89104 Attorney for Plaintiff Suzanne L. Martin Shelley L. Murray Nevada Bar No. 8833 Nevada Bar No. 12831 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Attorneys for Defendant 10 11 12 13 ORDER 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED: DATED this 25th day of January 2018. 18 19 20 _______________________________ DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?