Crebassa v. Manendo

Filing 13

ORDER that 11 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety, and Crebassa's objections 12 are OVERRULED. FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as delusional and frivolous. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 Sarah Crebassa,
4

Plaintiff

Case No.: 2:17-cv-02271-JAD-NJK
Order Adopting Report
and Recommendation

5 v.
[ECF Nos. 11, 12]
6 Mark Manendo,
7

Defendant

8

This is one of eight lawsuits that pro se plaintiff Sarah Crebassa filed in August 2017

9 against a wide variety of individuals and organizations.1 Her initial filing consisted of a single,
10 handwritten page on which she alleged that Mark Manendo “stalked” her while in jail and
11 “taunts [her] with his resume.”2 Magistrate Judge Koppe dismissed that initial filing for failure
12 to state a claim and with leave to amend.3 Crebassa’s amended complaint is far longer, but little
13 more comprehensible.4 Having screened it, Magistrate Judge Koppe characterizes this amended
14 complaint as “an incoherent narrative peppered with various disjointed allegations” with
15 “jumbled references to electromagnetic pulses, extremely low frequency electromagnetic
16 radiation and sonic ‘sounds.’”5 It “includes voluminous copies of” of documents and printed out
17 information, but Crebassa’s “description of the documents is unintelligible,” and she does not
18
19
1

2:17-cv-02270-JCM-GWF; 2:17-cv-02271-JAD-NJK; 2:17-cv-02272-APG-NJK; 2:17-cv02273-JAD-CWH; 2:17-cv-02274-RFB-PAL; 2:17-cv-02276-APG-NJK; 2:17-cv-02277-JAD21 NJK; 2:17-cv-02278-JCM-PAL.
2
ECF No. 1-1.
22 3
ECF No. 3.
20

23

4

ECF No. 10.

5

ECF No. 11 at 2 (quoting ECF No. 10).

1 explain “their application to the allegations or [her] narrative.”6 Because Crebassa “fails to
2 identify any elements of any cause of action[] and fails to provide, in a comprehensible manner,
3 any specific facts or intelligible narrative associated with these counts,” Magistrate Judge Koppe
4 recommends that I dismiss Crebassa’s amended complaint with prejudice “in light of [its]
5 frivolous and delusional nature.”7
Crebassa objects.8 Like her amended complaint, her objection is nonsensical and consists

6

7 mainly of hundreds of pages of articles, text messages, website screenshots, and other random
8 attachments, the relevancy of which is unclear. What is important, however, is that Crebassa’s
9 objection does not address—let alone cure—the significant problems with her amended
10 complaint; indeed, it only exacerbates them.9 So, after a de novo review,10 I find that Crebassa’s
11 allegations describe fantastic and delusional scenarios and do not state a claim upon which relief
12 can be granted.11 Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

13

14 [ECF No. 11] is ADOPTED in its entirety, and Crebassa’s objections [ECF No. 12] are
15 OVERRULED.
16 . . .
17
18
19

Id. at 3.

7

Id. at 2–3.

8

20

6

ECF No. 12.

21

9

23

10

See LR IB 3-2(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

11

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327–28 (1989).

Crebassa’s objection also contains a request for additional time for her to make copies of more
documents. See ECF No. 12. Because I do not find that additional documents would assist her
22
to make a coherent objection, I deny that request.

2

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as delusional

2 and frivolous. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE
3 THIS CASE.
4

Dated: February 5, 2019
_________________________________
________________
__ _
_ _
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
Judge Jennifer A. D
udg
fer

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

3