Mixon v. Neven et al
Filing
10
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; ORDER denying 6 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint; Respondents answer due 60 days from date of entry of this order. FURTHER IS ORDERED that any additional state court record exhibits filed herein by either petitioner or respondents shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
ANTONIO LEE MIXON,
9
10
11
12
13
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS,1 et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
____________________________________/
2:17-cv-02292-RFB-NJK
ORDER
14
On November 14, 2017, this court denied petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis
15
and directed him to pay the filing fee in order to proceed with his petition for writ of habeas corpus
16
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 8. A few days prior to the entry of that order and
17
unbeknownst to the court, petitioner had paid the required fee. ECF No. 7. The court has reviewed
18
the petition pursuant to Habeas Rule 4, and the petition shall be filed herein and served upon the
19
respondents.
20
A petition for federal habeas corpus should include all claims for relief of which petitioner is
21
aware. If petitioner fails to include such a claim in his petition, he may be forever barred from
22
seeking federal habeas relief upon that claim. See 28 U.S.C. §2244(b) (successive petitions). If
23
24
25
26
1
Brian E. Williams is the current warden at High Desert State Prison, petitioner’s place of
incarceration. As such he is substituted for D.W. Neven as a respondent herein. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
25(d).
1
petitioner is aware of any claim not included in his petition, he should notify the court of that as soon
2
as possible, perhaps by means of a motion to amend his petition to add the claim.
3
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall FILE the petition for writ of habeas
4
corpus (ECF No. 1-1) and ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition and a copy of this order on the
5
respondents.
6
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall add Adam Paul Laxalt,
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents.
8
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 60 days from the date of entry of
this order to appear in this action, and to answer or otherwise respond to the petition.
10
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if respondents file an answer, petitioner shall have 60
11
days from the date on which the answer is served on him to file and serve a reply. If respondents file
12
a motion to dismiss, petitioner shall have 60 days from the date on which the motion is served on
13
him to file and serve a response to the motion to dismiss, and respondents shall, thereafter, have 30
14
days to file a reply in support of the motion.
15
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that any additional state court record exhibits filed herein by
16
either petitioner or respondents shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the
17
exhibits by number. The CM/ECF attachments that are filed further shall be identified by the
18
number or numbers of the exhibits in the attachment. The hard copy of any additional state court
19
record exhibits shall be forwarded – for this case – to the staff attorneys in Reno.
20
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall substitute Brian E. Williams for D.W.
21
Neven as a respondent in this proceeding. Accordingly, petitioner’s motion for leave to amend (ECF
22
No. 6) is DENIED as moot.
23
\\\
24
\\
25
26
2
1
2
3
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for leave to file excess pages (ECF
No. 2) is GRANTED.
DATED this 20th day of November, 2017.
4
5
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?