Cabansag v. Geico Casualty Company

Filing 10

ORDER that 5 Motion to Dismiss Bad-Faith Claim is GRANTED, and 6 Motion to Sever, Bifurcate, and Stay is DENIED as moot. Cabansag's claim for bad faith is DISMISSED, and the 11/6/17 hearing on these motions is VACATED as moot. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 German Cabansag, 2:17-cv-02306-JAD-GWF 4 Plaintiff 5 Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Bad-Faith Claim vs. 6 (ECF Nos. 5, 6) 7 8 Geico Casualty Co., Defendant 9 10 Geico Casualty Company moves to dismiss (or alternatively to sever, bifurcate, and stay) 11 plaintiff German Cabansag’s bad-faith claim against it.1 Cabansag’s deadline to oppose this motion 12 was September 22, 2017. That deadline passed a month ago, and Cabansag has not filed an 13 opposition nor moved to extend his deadline to do so.2 Local Rule 7-2(d) states that “The failure of 14 an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion . . . constitutes a consent to 15 the granting of the motion.” I apply the local rule and deem Cabansag’s failure to oppose these 16 motions as his consent to granting them. 17 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Geico’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 5] is 18 GRANTED, and its alternative Motion to Sever, Bifurcate, and Stay [ECF No. 6] is DENIED as 19 moot. Cabansag’s claim for bad faith is DISMISSED, and the 11/6/17 hearing on these 20 motions is VACATED as moot. 21 DATED: October 23, 2017 22 ___________________________________ ________________ _ _ _ _ _ Jennifer A. Dorsey Dorsey rse United States District Judge s Judge g 23 24 25 26 1 ECF Nos. 5, 6. 27 2 28 Curiously, however, the parties’ October 5, 2017, joint status report states that “Plaintiff will file a Response to these Motions.” ECF No. 9 at 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?