Mortgage Fund IVC Trust 2016-RN5 v. Brown et al
Filing
51
ORDER that plaintiff Mortgage Fund IVC Trust shall seek a default judgment under FRCP 55 against Republic Services or voluntarily dismiss its judicial foreclosure claim within fourteen days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 1/23/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
MORTGAGE FUND IVC TRUST 2016-RN5,
8
9
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:17-cv-2309-KJD-BNW
ORDER
v.
DEWEY D. BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.
This is an action to determine who holds the superior interest in a property located at
13
2175 Clearwater Lake Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada. On September 24, 2019, the Court
14
determined that the plaintiff, Mortgage Fund IVC Trust, held the superior interest by virtue of a
15
lender’s deed of trust. In so finding, the Court quieted title in Mortgage Fund and declared that
16
its deed of trust survived Sun City Anthem Community Association’s nonjudicial foreclosure.
17
See Order 10, ECF No. 45. Though the Court’s order did not adjudicate all of Mortgage Fund’s
18
claims, defendant Saticoy Bay LLC appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit. Not. of App.,
19
ECF No. 47. On January 23, 2020, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for want of
20
jurisdiction. ECF No. 50. The appellate court found that “[a] review of the record demonstrates
21
that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the judgment challenged in the appeal is
22
not final or appealable.” Id. at 1. This order follows.
23
In September of 2017, Mortgage Fund IVC Trust brought four causes of action against
24
four defendants. It alleged: (1) a quiet title/declaratory judgment claim against each defendant;
25
(2) a judicial foreclosure claim against borrowers Dewey and Lillian Brown and against
26
Republic Services; (3) an alternative breach of contract claim against the Browns; and (4) an
27
injunctive relief claim against Saticoy Bay. Compl. 5–13, ECF No. 1. Each of the defendants
28
received service of process. See ECF Nos. 6 (Republic Services), 7 (Saticoy Bay), 13 (Dewey
1
2
Brown), and 14 (Lillian Brown). Yet, only Saticoy Bay actively participated in the suit.
In May of 2018, Mortgage Fund and Saticoy Bay filed competing motions for summary
3
judgment on Mortgage Fund’s quiet title/declaratory relief claim. The Court granted judgment in
4
Mortgage Fund’s favor on the quiet title claim and dismissed its injunctive relief claim. Order at
5
4. By granting summary judgment on the quiet title claim and dismissing the injunctive relief
6
claim, the Court adjudicated each of the claims against Saticoy Bay. Mortgage Fund did not
7
move for summary judgment on its judicial foreclosure or alternative breach of contract claims
8
against Republic Services or the Browns, so the Court did not reach them.1 Accordingly, those
9
two claims survived summary judgment.
10
Shortly after summary judgment, Mortgage Fund voluntarily dismissed its alternative
11
breach of contract claim against Dewey and Lillian Brown. See Not. of Vol. D., ECF No. 49.
12
Mortgage Fund did not voluntarily dismiss its judicial foreclosure claims against Republic
13
Services, however. As far as the Court can tell, that lone claim against Republic Services persists
14
and prevents the Ninth Circuit from exercising jurisdiction over Saticoy Bay’s appeal.
15
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Mortgage Fund IVC Trust shall
16
seek a default judgment under FRCP 55 against Republic Services or voluntarily dismiss its
17
judicial foreclosure claim within fourteen days of the entry of this order. If Mortgage Fund elects
18
not to dismiss that claim or seek a default judgment, it shall file a status report on that claim
19
within fourteen days of entry of this order.
20
Dated this 23rd day of January, 2020.
21
22
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court found, “[Mortgage Fund] seeks summary judgment only on its quiet title and declaratory relief
claim against each defendant and its claim for injunctive relief against Saticoy Bay.” Order at 4. It also recognized
that “[Mortgage Fund’s] two remaining claims are judicial foreclosure against the original borrower[s] and Republic
Services and breach of contract against the borrower[s].” Id. at 4 n.2.
1
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?