Mortgage Fund IVC Trust 2016-RN5 v. Brown et al

Filing 51

ORDER that plaintiff Mortgage Fund IVC Trust shall seek a default judgment under FRCP 55 against Republic Services or voluntarily dismiss its judicial foreclosure claim within fourteen days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 1/23/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 MORTGAGE FUND IVC TRUST 2016-RN5, 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:17-cv-2309-KJD-BNW ORDER v. DEWEY D. BROWN, et al., Defendants. This is an action to determine who holds the superior interest in a property located at 13 2175 Clearwater Lake Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada. On September 24, 2019, the Court 14 determined that the plaintiff, Mortgage Fund IVC Trust, held the superior interest by virtue of a 15 lender’s deed of trust. In so finding, the Court quieted title in Mortgage Fund and declared that 16 its deed of trust survived Sun City Anthem Community Association’s nonjudicial foreclosure. 17 See Order 10, ECF No. 45. Though the Court’s order did not adjudicate all of Mortgage Fund’s 18 claims, defendant Saticoy Bay LLC appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit. Not. of App., 19 ECF No. 47. On January 23, 2020, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for want of 20 jurisdiction. ECF No. 50. The appellate court found that “[a] review of the record demonstrates 21 that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the judgment challenged in the appeal is 22 not final or appealable.” Id. at 1. This order follows. 23 In September of 2017, Mortgage Fund IVC Trust brought four causes of action against 24 four defendants. It alleged: (1) a quiet title/declaratory judgment claim against each defendant; 25 (2) a judicial foreclosure claim against borrowers Dewey and Lillian Brown and against 26 Republic Services; (3) an alternative breach of contract claim against the Browns; and (4) an 27 injunctive relief claim against Saticoy Bay. Compl. 5–13, ECF No. 1. Each of the defendants 28 received service of process. See ECF Nos. 6 (Republic Services), 7 (Saticoy Bay), 13 (Dewey 1 2 Brown), and 14 (Lillian Brown). Yet, only Saticoy Bay actively participated in the suit. In May of 2018, Mortgage Fund and Saticoy Bay filed competing motions for summary 3 judgment on Mortgage Fund’s quiet title/declaratory relief claim. The Court granted judgment in 4 Mortgage Fund’s favor on the quiet title claim and dismissed its injunctive relief claim. Order at 5 4. By granting summary judgment on the quiet title claim and dismissing the injunctive relief 6 claim, the Court adjudicated each of the claims against Saticoy Bay. Mortgage Fund did not 7 move for summary judgment on its judicial foreclosure or alternative breach of contract claims 8 against Republic Services or the Browns, so the Court did not reach them.1 Accordingly, those 9 two claims survived summary judgment. 10 Shortly after summary judgment, Mortgage Fund voluntarily dismissed its alternative 11 breach of contract claim against Dewey and Lillian Brown. See Not. of Vol. D., ECF No. 49. 12 Mortgage Fund did not voluntarily dismiss its judicial foreclosure claims against Republic 13 Services, however. As far as the Court can tell, that lone claim against Republic Services persists 14 and prevents the Ninth Circuit from exercising jurisdiction over Saticoy Bay’s appeal. 15 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Mortgage Fund IVC Trust shall 16 seek a default judgment under FRCP 55 against Republic Services or voluntarily dismiss its 17 judicial foreclosure claim within fourteen days of the entry of this order. If Mortgage Fund elects 18 not to dismiss that claim or seek a default judgment, it shall file a status report on that claim 19 within fourteen days of entry of this order. 20 Dated this 23rd day of January, 2020. 21 22 _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court found, “[Mortgage Fund] seeks summary judgment only on its quiet title and declaratory relief claim against each defendant and its claim for injunctive relief against Saticoy Bay.” Order at 4. It also recognized that “[Mortgage Fund’s] two remaining claims are judicial foreclosure against the original borrower[s] and Republic Services and breach of contract against the borrower[s].” Id. at 4 n.2. 1 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?