Lubritz v. AIG Claims, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER re 9 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. The discovery plan is DENIED and the parties shall file a discovery plan that complies with the local rules by 9/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10

JOEL LUBRITZ,

11

Plaintiff(s),

12

vs.

13

AIG CLAIMS, INC.,

14

Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:17-cv-02310-APG-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 9)

15
Pending before the Court is a proposed discovery plan, Docket No. 9, that fails to provide the
16
certifications required by Local Rule 26-1(b)(7)-(8) and misstates the deadline for seeking extensions
17

established by Local Rule 26-4.1 Accordingly, the discovery plan is DENIED and the parties shall file

18
a discovery plan that complies with the local rules by September 28, 2017.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
DATED: September 22, 2017
21
22

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Such extension requests must be filed 21 days before expiration of the subject deadline, not 21 days
before the discovery cutoff. See Local Rule 26-4. For example, filing a request to extend the deadline for
initial experts that is 21 days before the discovery cutoff is untimely, as the initial expert deadline would
have already expired weeks earlier.