Lubritz v. AIG Claims, Inc.
ORDER re 9 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. The discovery plan is DENIED and the parties shall file a discovery plan that complies with the local rules by 9/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
AIG CLAIMS, INC.,
Case No. 2:17-cv-02310-APG-NJK
(Docket No. 9)
Pending before the Court is a proposed discovery plan, Docket No. 9, that fails to provide the
certifications required by Local Rule 26-1(b)(7)-(8) and misstates the deadline for seeking extensions
established by Local Rule 26-4.1 Accordingly, the discovery plan is DENIED and the parties shall file
a discovery plan that complies with the local rules by September 28, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 22, 2017
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Such extension requests must be filed 21 days before expiration of the subject deadline, not 21 days
before the discovery cutoff. See Local Rule 26-4. For example, filing a request to extend the deadline for
initial experts that is 21 days before the discovery cutoff is untimely, as the initial expert deadline would
have already expired weeks earlier.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?