Lubritz v. AIG Claims, Inc.

Filing 28

ORDER Granting 27 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Responses due by 4/30/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02310-APG-NJK Document 27 Filed 04/16/18 Page 1 of 3 1 CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS DONALD J. CAMPBELL, ESQ. (1216) 2 SAMUEL R. MIRKOVICH, ESQ. (11662) 3 4 700 South Seventh Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 5 Tel: (702) 382-5222 Fax: (702) 382-0540 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 JOEL LUBRITZ 11 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. AIG CLAIMS, INC., a Delaware 14 Corporation; DOES I through X, 15 inclusive; ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive; ROE LIMITED LIABILITY 16 COMPANIES I through X, inclusive, 17 18 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:17-cv-02310-APG-NJK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT AIG CLAIMS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO 24] [FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION] 19 Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Joel Lubritz (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant 20 AIG Claims, Inc. (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff to file his 21 Opposition to Defendant AIG Claims, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 24]. 22 23 On March 30, 2018, Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 24]. Plaintiff’s Opposition is scheduled to be due on Friday, April 20, 2018 but, because Plaintiff’s 24 25 26 counsel is scheduled to begin voir dire in the matter of Elaine P. Wynn v. Stephen A. Wynn et al., Case No. A-12-656710-C, Plaintiff’s counsel respectfully requests a ten (10) day extension in 27 which to file the Opposition. Plaintiff submits that good cause exists to approve this stipulation 28 because of his counsel’s current trial schedule and, moreover, because the Parties are currently Page 1 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-02310-APG-NJK Document 27 Filed 04/16/18 Page 2 of 3 1 scheduled to argue Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the Production of An Unredacted Copy of 2 Defendant’s Claims Notes Pursuant to FRE 612 [ECF No. 18] on April 16, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. Thus, 3 4 5 6 the instant stipulation will allow Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel to be resolved and, if necessary, additional discovery documents to be produced before Plaintiff’s Opposition would be due so that Plaintiff would not need to seek relief pursuant to FRCP 56(f). Finally, granting this extension will 7 not require the Court to alter any hearing date on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as no 8 such hearing date has been set. 9 Based on the foregoing, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court issue an 10 Order extending the deadline for Plaintiff to file his Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for 11 12 13 14 Summary Judgment [ECF No. 24] by no later than April 30, 2018. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: April 16, 2018 TYSON & MENDES LLP By /s/ Carrie McCrea Hanlon Carrie McCrea Hanlon, Esq. (3902) 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Attorneys for Defendant AIG Claims, Inc. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 DATED: April 16, 2018 CAMPBELL AND WILLIAMS By /s/ Samuel R. Mirkovich Donald J. Campbell, Esq. (1216) Samuel R. Mirkovich, Esq. (11662) 700 South Seventh Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiff 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Based on the Stipulation between Plaintiff and Defendant [ECF No. 25], which I treat as a joint motion under LR 6-1(a), IT IS SO ORDERED. joint motion under LR 6-1(a), IT IS SO ORDERED. 4/16/2018 _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?